Removal independence and multi-consensus functions
Mathématiques et Sciences humaines, Tome 148 (1999), pp. 31-40.

Vincke et Bouyssou ont montré que, si une procédure d'agrégation de préordres totaux peut retourner plusieurs solutions, alors elle peut satisfaire tous les axiomes du théorème d'Arrow sans être pour autant dictatoriale. Nous étendons cette approche aux hiérarchies utilisées en classification. Dans ce contexte, on obtient des résultats qui peuvent différer de ceux de Vincke et de Bouyssou.

Work of Vincke and Bouyssou showed that if aggregation procedures on weak orders are allowed to return more than one result, then it might be possible for a procedure to satisfy all the axioms of Arrow's Theorem yet not be dictatorial. This approach is extended from ordered sets to n-trees, which are set-systems used in classifications theory. Results in this context can differ from those of Vincke and Bouyssou.

Mots clés : théorie de la décision, consensus, multi-fonctions de consensus, hiérarchies, théorème d'Arrow
@article{MSH_1999__148__31_0,
     author = {Dwyer, Mark and McMorris, Fred R. and Powers, Robert},
     title = {Removal independence and multi-consensus functions},
     journal = {Math\'ematiques et Sciences humaines},
     pages = {31--40},
     publisher = {Ecole des hautes-\'etudes en sciences sociales},
     volume = {148},
     year = {1999},
     mrnumber = {1740578},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/item/MSH_1999__148__31_0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dwyer, Mark
AU  - McMorris, Fred R.
AU  - Powers, Robert
TI  - Removal independence and multi-consensus functions
JO  - Mathématiques et Sciences humaines
PY  - 1999
DA  - 1999///
SP  - 31
EP  - 40
VL  - 148
PB  - Ecole des hautes-études en sciences sociales
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/item/MSH_1999__148__31_0/
UR  - https://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1740578
LA  - en
ID  - MSH_1999__148__31_0
ER  - 
Dwyer, Mark; McMorris, Fred R.; Powers, Robert C. Removal independence and multi-consensus functions. Mathématiques et Sciences humaines, Tome 148 (1999), pp. 31-40. http://www.numdam.org/item/MSH_1999__148__31_0/

Adams, E.N., "Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees", Systematic Zoology, 21 (1972), 390-397.

Arrow, K.J., Social Choice and lndividual Values. 2nd edn., New York, John Wiley (1963).

Barthélemy, J.P., Leclerc, B. and Monjardet, B., "On the use of ordered sets in problems of comparison and consensus of classifications", Journal of Classification, 3 (1986), 187-224. | MR 874238 | Zbl 0647.62056

Barthélemy, J.P. and Mcmorris, F.R., "On an independence condition for consensus n-trees", Applied Mathematics Letters, 2 (1989), 75-78. | MR 989865 | Zbl 0709.90008

Barthélemy, J.P., Mcmorris, F.R. and Powers, R.C., "Independence conditions for consensus n-trees revisited", Applied Mathematics Letters, 2 (1991), 43-46. | MR 989865 | Zbl 0749.90005

Barthélemy, J.P., Mcmorris, F.R. and Powers, R.C., "Stability conditions for consensus functions defined on n-trees", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 22 (1995), 79-87. | MR 1343655 | Zbl 0833.90009

Bouyssou, D., "Democracy and efficiency: A note on 'Arrow's theorem is not a surprising result'", European Journal of Operational Research, 58 (1992), 427-430. | Zbl 0762.90003

Colonius, H. and Schulze, H.H., "Tree structures for proximity data", The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34 (1981), 167-180. | MR 649328 | Zbl 0472.62107

Lapointe, F.J. and Cucumel G., "The average consensus procedure: combination of weighted trees containing identical or overlapping sets of objects", Systematic Zoology, 46 (1997), 306-312.

Leclerc, B. and Cucumel, G., "Consensus en classification: une revue bibliographique", Mathématiques Informatique et Sciences Humaines, 100 (1987),109-128. | Numdam | MR 941912 | Zbl 0635.62055

Leclerc, B., "Consensus of classifications: the case of trees", in Advances in Data Science and Classification, A. Rizzi, M. Vicki and H.-H. Bock, Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998), 81-90. | Zbl 1051.91530

Vincke, P., "Arrow's Theorem is not a surprising result", European Journal of Operational Research., 10 (1982), 22-25. | MR 655494 | Zbl 0483.90008