Measuring the Irreversibility of Numerical Schemes for Reversible Stochastic Differential Equations
ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique, Volume 48 (2014) no. 5, p. 1351-1379
The full text of recent articles is available to journal subscribers only. See the article on the journal's website

For a stationary Markov process the detailed balance condition is equivalent to the time-reversibility of the process. For stochastic differential equations (SDE's), the time discretization of numerical schemes usually destroys the time-reversibility property. Despite an extensive literature on the numerical analysis for SDE's, their stability properties, strong and/or weak error estimates, large deviations and infinite-time estimates, no quantitative results are known on the lack of reversibility of discrete-time approximation processes. In this paper we provide such quantitative estimates by using the concept of entropy production rate, inspired by ideas from non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. The entropy production rate for a stochastic process is defined as the relative entropy (per unit time) of the path measure of the process with respect to the path measure of the time-reversed process. By construction the entropy production rate is nonnegative and it vanishes if and only if the process is reversible. Crucially, from a numerical point of view, the entropy production rate is an a posteriori quantity, hence it can be computed in the course of a simulation as the ergodic average of a certain functional of the process (the so-called Gallavotti-Cohen (GC) action functional). We compute the entropy production for various numerical schemes such as explicit Euler-Maruyama and explicit Milstein's for reversible SDEs with additive or multiplicative noise. In addition we analyze the entropy production for the BBK integrator for the Langevin equation. The order (in the time-discretization step Δt) of the entropy production rate provides a tool to classify numerical schemes in terms of their (discretization-induced) irreversibility. Our results show that the type of the noise critically affects the behavior of the entropy production rate. As a striking example of our results we show that the Euler scheme for multiplicative noise is not an adequate scheme from a reversibility point of view since its entropy production rate does not decrease with Δt.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2013142
Classification:  65C30,  82C3,  60H10
Keywords: stochastic differential equations, detailed balance, reversibility, relative entropy, entropy production, numerical integration, (overdamped) Langevin process
@article{M2AN_2014__48_5_1351_0,
     author = {Katsoulakis, Markos and Pantazis, Yannis and Rey-Bellet, Luc},
     title = {Measuring the Irreversibility of Numerical Schemes for Reversible Stochastic Differential Equations},
     journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Mod\'elisation Math\'ematique et Analyse Num\'erique},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {48},
     number = {5},
     year = {2014},
     pages = {1351-1379},
     doi = {10.1051/m2an/2013142},
     mrnumber = {3264357},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/item/M2AN_2014__48_5_1351_0}
}
Katsoulakis, Markos; Pantazis, Yannis; Rey-Bellet, Luc. Measuring the Irreversibility of Numerical Schemes for Reversible Stochastic Differential Equations. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique, Volume 48 (2014) no. 5, pp. 1351-1379. doi : 10.1051/m2an/2013142. http://www.numdam.org/item/M2AN_2014__48_5_1351_0/

[1] G. Arampatzis, M.A. Katsoulakis, P. Plechac, M. Taufer and L. Xu, Hierarchical fractional-step approximations and parallel kinetic Monte Carlo algorithms. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012) 7795-7841. | MR 2972869 | Zbl 1259.82110

[2] V. Bally and D. Talay, The law of the Euler scheme for stochastic differential equations. I. Convergence rate of the density. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 2 (1996) 93-128. | MR 1401964 | Zbl 0866.60049

[3] V. Bally and D. Talay, The law of the Euler scheme for stochastic differential equations. I. Convergence rate of the distribution function. Probab. Theory Related Fields 104 (1996) 43-60. | MR 1367666 | Zbl 0838.60051

[4] N. Bou-Rabee and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Pathwise accuracy and ergodicity of Metropolized integrators for SDEs. Commut. Pure Appl. Math. LXIII (2010) 0655-0696. | MR 2583309 | Zbl 1214.60031

[5] A. Brunger, C.B. Brooks and M. Karplus, Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2 water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 105 (1984) 495-500.

[6] S. Delong, B.E. Griffith, E. Vanden-Eijnden and A. Donev, Temporal integrators for fluctuating hydrodynamics. Phys. Rev. E 87 (2013) 11.

[7] G. Gallavotti and E.G.D. Cohen, Dynamical ensembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 2694-2697.

[8] C. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences. Springer Series in Synergetics (1985). | MR 858704 | Zbl 0515.60002

[9] D.T. Gillespie, Markov Processes: An Introduction for Physical Scientists. Academic Press, New York (1992). | MR 1133392 | Zbl 0743.60001

[10] E. Hairer, Ch. Lubich and G. Wanner, Structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations, in Geometric Numerical Integration. vol. 31 of Springer Ser. Comput. Math., 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006). | MR 2221614 | Zbl 1094.65125

[11] V. Jakšić, C.-A. Pillet and L. Rey-Bellet, Entropic fluctuations in statistical mechanics: I. classical dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 2 (2011) 699-763. | MR 2765481 | Zbl 1234.37012

[12] R. Khasminskii, Stochastic Stability of Differential Equations, 2nd edition. Springer (2010). | MR 2894052 | Zbl 1241.60002

[13] P.E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution Stochastic Differential Equations, 3rd edition. Springer-Verlag (1999). | MR 1214374 | Zbl 0752.60043

[14] J.L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, A Gallavotti-Cohen type symmetry in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics. J. Stat. Phys. 95 (1999) 333-365. | MR 1705590 | Zbl 0934.60090

[15] T. Lelievre, M. Rousset and G. Stoltz, Free Energy Computations: A Math. Perspective. Imperial College Press (2010). | MR 2681239 | Zbl 1227.82002

[16] C. Maes and K. Netočný, Minimum entropy production principle from a dynamical fluctuation law. J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 053306. | MR 2329862 | Zbl 1144.81384

[17] C. Maes, K. Netočný and B. Wynants, Steady state statistics of driven diffusions. Phys. A 387 (2008) 2675-2689. | MR 2587167

[18] C. Maes, F. Redig and A. Van Moffaert, On the definition of entropy production, via examples. J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 1528-1553. | MR 1757968 | Zbl 0977.82025

[19] J.C. Mattingly, A.M. Stuart and M.V. Tretyakov, Convergence of numerical time-averaging and stationary measures via Poisson equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48 (2010) 552-577. | MR 2669996 | Zbl 1217.65014

[20] J.C. Mattingly, A.M. Stuart and D.J. Higham, Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise. Stoch. Process. Appl. 101 (2002) 185-232. | MR 1931266 | Zbl 1075.60072

[21] S.P. Meyn and R.L. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer-Verlag (1993). | MR 1287609 | Zbl 0925.60001

[22] G. Milstein and M. Tretyakov, Stochastic Numerics for Mathematical Physics for Springer (2004). | MR 2069903 | Zbl 1085.60004

[23] G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. Wiley, New York (1977). | MR 522141 | Zbl 0363.93005

[24] L. Rey-Bellet and L.E. Thomas, Exponential convergence to non-equilibrium stationary states in classical statistical mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys. 225 (2002) 305-329. | MR 1889227 | Zbl 0989.82023

[25] L. Rey-Bellet, Ergodic properties of Markov processes. In Open quantum systems. II, vol. 1881. Lect. Notes Math. Springer, Berlin (2006) 1-39. | MR 2248986 | Zbl 1126.60057

[26] G.O. Roberts and R.L. Tweedie, Geometric convergence and central limit theorems for multidimensional Hastings and Metropolis algorithms. Biometrika 83 (1996) 95-110. | MR 1399158 | Zbl 0888.60064

[27] T. Schlick, Molecular Modeling and Simulation. Springer (2002). | MR 1921061 | Zbl 1011.92019

[28] J. Schnakenberg, Network theory of microscopic and macroscopic behavior of master equation systems. Rev. Modern Phys. 48 (1976) 571-585. | MR 443796

[29] Yunsic Shim and J.G. Amar, Semirigorous synchronous relaxation algorithm for parallel kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of thin film growth. Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 125-432. | Zbl 1087.82015

[30] D. Talay, Second order discretization schemes of stochastic differential systems for the computation of the invariant law. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 29 (1990) 13-36. | Zbl 0697.60066

[31] D. Talay, Stochastic Hamiltonian systems: exponential convergence to the invariant measure, and discretization by the implicit Euler scheme. Markov Processes and Related Fields 8 (2002) 163-198. | MR 1924934 | Zbl 1011.60039

[32] D. Talay and L. Tubaro, Expansion of the global error for numerical schemes solving stochastic differential equations. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 8 (1990) 483-509. | MR 1091544 | Zbl 0718.60058

[33] N.G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North Holland (2006). | Zbl 0974.60020