Global approximate controllability for Schrödinger equation in higher Sobolev norms and applications

Nersesyan, Vahagn

doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004

Nersesyan, Vahagn

Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire, Tome 27 (2010) no. 3, pp. 901-915

Résumé

We prove that the Schrödinger equation is approximately controllable in Sobolev spaces $H^{s}$ , $s > 0$ , generically with respect to the potential. We give two applications of this result. First, in the case of one space dimension, combining our result with a local exact controllability property, we get the global exact controllability of the system in higher Sobolev spaces. Then we prove that the Schrödinger equation with a potential which has a random time-dependent amplitude admits at most one stationary measure on the unit sphere S in $L^{2}$ .

MR Zbl | 2 citations dans Numdam

DOI : 10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004

@article{AIHPC_2010__27_3_901_0,
     author = {Nersesyan, Vahagn},
     title = {Global approximate controllability for {Schr\"odinger} equation in higher {Sobolev} norms and applications},
     journal = {Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non lin\'eaire},
     pages = {901--915},
     year = {2010},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {27},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004},
     mrnumber = {2629885},
     zbl = {1191.35257},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004/}
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nersesyan, Vahagn
TI  - Global approximate controllability for Schrödinger equation in higher Sobolev norms and applications
JO  - Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire
PY  - 2010
SP  - 901
EP  - 915
VL  - 27
IS  - 3
PB  - Elsevier
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004/
DO  - 10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004
LA  - en
ID  - AIHPC_2010__27_3_901_0
ER  -

%0 Journal Article
%A Nersesyan, Vahagn
%T Global approximate controllability for Schrödinger equation in higher Sobolev norms and applications
%J Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire
%D 2010
%P 901-915
%V 27
%N 3
%I Elsevier
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004/
%R 10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004
%G en
%F AIHPC_2010__27_3_901_0

Nersesyan, Vahagn. Global approximate controllability for Schrödinger equation in higher Sobolev norms and applications. Annales de l'I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire, Tome 27 (2010) no. 3, pp. 901-915. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2010.01.004

Bibliographie
Cité par

[1] A. Agrachev, T. Chambrion, An estimation of the controllability time for single-input systems on compact Lie groups, J. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 12 no. 3 (2006), 409-441 | MR | EuDML | Zbl | Numdam

[2] J.H. Albert, Genericity of simple eigenvalues for elliptic PDE's, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1975), 413-418 | MR | Zbl

[3] F. Albertini, D. D'Alessandro, Notions of controllability for bilinear multilevel quantum systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 48 no. 8 (2003), 1399-1403 | MR

[4] C. Altafini, Controllability of quantum mechanical systems by root space decomposition of $𝑠𝑢 (n)$ , J. Math. Phys. 43 no. 5 (2002), 2051-2062 | MR | Zbl

[5] J.M. Ball, J.E. Marsden, M. Slemrod, Controllability for distributed bilinear systems, SIAM J. Control Optim. 20 no. 4 (1982), 575-597 | MR | Zbl

[6] L. Baudouin, J.-P. Puel, Uniqueness and stability in an inverse problem for the Schrödinger equation, Inverse Problems 18 no. 6 (2001), 1537-1554 | MR | Zbl

[7] K. Beauchard, Local controllability of a 1D Schrödinger equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. 84 no. 7 (2005), 851-956 | MR | Zbl

[8] K. Beauchard, Local controllability of a 1D bilinear Schrödinger equation: a simpler proof, Preprint, 2009

[9] K. Beauchard, J.-M. Coron, Controllability of a quantum particle in a moving potential well, J. Funct. Anal. 232 no. 2 (2006), 328-389 | MR | Zbl

[10] K. Beauchard, J.-M. Coron, M. Mirrahimi, P. Rouchon, Implicit Lyapunov control of finite dimensional Schrödinger equations, Systems Control Lett. 56 no. 5 (2007), 388-395 | MR | Zbl

[11] K. Beauchard, M. Mirrahimi, Practical stabilization of a quantum particle in a one-dimensional infinite square potential well, SIAM J. Control Optim. 48 no. 2 (2009), 1179-1205 | MR | Zbl

[12] J. Bourgain, Periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and invariant measures, Comm. Math. Phys. 166 no. 1 (1994), 1-26 | MR | Zbl

[13] T. Cazenave, Semilinear Schrödinger Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 10, AMS (2003) | MR | Zbl

[14] T. Chambrion, P. Mason, M. Sigalotti, U. Boscain, Controllability of the discrete-spectrum Schrödinger equation driven by an external field, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26 no. 1 (2009), 329-349 | MR | EuDML | Zbl | Numdam

[15] A. Debussche, C. Odasso, Ergodicity for a weakly damped stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations, J. Evol. Eq. 3 no. 5 (2005), 317-356 | MR | Zbl

[16] B. Dehman, P. Gérard, G. Lebeau, Stabilization and control for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a compact surface, Math. Z. 254 no. 4 (2006), 729-749 | MR | Zbl

[17] S. Ervedoza, J.-P. Puel, Approximate controllability for a system of Schrödinger equations modeling a single trapped ion, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 26 no. 6 (2009), 2111-2136 | MR | EuDML | Zbl | Numdam

[18] A. Henrot, Extremum Problems for Eigenvalues of Elliptic Operators, Birkhäuser (2006) | MR | Zbl

[19] D. Jerison, C.E. Kenig, Unique continuation and absence of positive eigenvalues for Schrödinger operators (with an appendix by E.M. Stein), Ann. of Math. 121 no. 3 (1985), 463-494 | MR | Zbl

[20] T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin (1995) | MR | Zbl

[21] Y. Kifer, Ergodic Theory of Random Transformations, Birkhäuser (1986) | MR | Zbl

[22] S. Kuksin, A. Shirikyan, Ergodicity for the randomly forced 2D Navier–Stokes equations, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 4 no. 2 (2001), 147-195 | MR | Zbl

[23] S. Kuksin, A. Shirikyan, Randomly forced CGL equation: stationary measures and the inviscid limit, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 no. 12 (2004), 3805-3822 | MR | Zbl

[24] G. Lebeau, Contrôle de l'équation de Schrödinger, J. Math. Pures Appl. 71 no. 3 (1992), 267-291 | MR | Zbl

[25] E. Machtyngier, E. Zuazua, Stabilization of the Schrödinger equation, Portugaliae Matematica 51 no. 2 (1994), 243-256 | MR | EuDML | Zbl

[26] M. Mirrahimi, Lyapunov control of a particle in a finite quantum potential well, in: IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, San Diego, 2006

[27] V. Nersesyan, Exponential mixing for finite-dimensional approximations of the Schrödinger equation with multiplicative noise, Dynam. PDE 6 no. 2 (2009), 167-183 | MR | Zbl

[28] V. Nersesyan, Growth of Sobolev norms and controllability of the Schrödinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 290 no. 1 (2009), 371-387 | MR | Zbl

[29] B. Øksendal, Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag (2003) | MR

[30] V.N. Pivovarchik, An inverse Sturm–Liouville problem by three spectra, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory 34 no. 2 (1999), 234-243 | MR | Zbl

[31] Y. Privat, M. Sigalotti, The squares of Laplacian–Dirichlet eigenfunctions are generically linearly independent, Preprint, 2008

[32] V. Ramakrishna, M. Salapaka, M. Dahleh, H. Rabitz, A. Pierce, Controllability of molecular systems, Phys. Rev. A 51 no. 2 (1995), 960-966

[33] M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. 4: Analysis of Operators, Academic Press, New York (1978)

[34] M. Teytel, How rare are multiple eigenvalues?, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52 no. 8 (1999), 917-934 | MR | Zbl

[35] G. Turinici, On the Controllability of Bilinear Quantum Systems, Lecture Notes in Chem., vol. 74, 2000 | MR

[36] G. Turinici, H. Rabitz, Quantum wavefunction controllability, Chem. Phys. 267 no. 1 (2001), 1-9

[37] N. Tzvetkov, Invariant measures for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the disc, Dynam. PDE 3 no. 2 (2006), 111-160 | MR | Zbl

[38] E. Zuazua, Remarks on the controllability of the Schrödinger equation, CRM Proc. Lecture Notes 33 (2003), 193-211 | MR

Cité par Sources :