The stochastıc vikor method and its use in reverse logistic option selection problem
RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 2, pp. 375-389.

In this paper a new method, SMAA-VIKOR, was proposed for stochastic multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems and the effectiveness of the method was shown by comparing literature data and a case study. In some decision making situations, decision makers (DMs) can’t or don’t express their preferences openly. In such cases stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) is applicable. The proposed method, SMAA-VIKOR, is the combination of the SMAA-2 and VIKOR methods. Our aim was to see if we can employ VIKOR in handling imprecise, uncertain data, in a word to compose stochastic VIKOR. The SMAA-VIKOR method was applied to the drug benefit-risk analysis problem in the literature. In addition, a case study evaluating the reverse logistic option selection problem is used to illustrate the proposed method. This study indicated that VIKOR could be used with uncertain and arbitrarily distributed values for weights and criteria measurements by using SMAA-VIKOR. The results show that SMAA-VIKOR gives more significant and consistent SMAA outputs and it can also be effective in helping logistic managers in decision making

DOI : 10.1051/ro/2016027
Classification : 90B50
Mots clés : Stochastic multi-criteria decision making, acceptability analysis, VIKOR, reverse logistic
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya 1 ; Ozmen, Mihrimah 1

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 Talas, Kayseri, Turkey.
@article{RO_2017__51_2_375_0,
     author = {Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya and Ozmen, Mihrimah},
     title = {The stochast{\i}c vikor method and its use in reverse logistic option selection problem},
     journal = {RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Op\'erationnelle},
     pages = {375--389},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {51},
     number = {2},
     year = {2017},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2016027},
     mrnumber = {3657430},
     zbl = {1365.90152},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016027/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya
AU  - Ozmen, Mihrimah
TI  - The stochastıc vikor method and its use in reverse logistic option selection problem
JO  - RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
PY  - 2017
SP  - 375
EP  - 389
VL  - 51
IS  - 2
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016027/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2016027
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2017__51_2_375_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya
%A Ozmen, Mihrimah
%T The stochastıc vikor method and its use in reverse logistic option selection problem
%J RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle
%D 2017
%P 375-389
%V 51
%N 2
%I EDP-Sciences
%U http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016027/
%R 10.1051/ro/2016027
%G en
%F RO_2017__51_2_375_0
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya; Ozmen, Mihrimah. The stochastıc vikor method and its use in reverse logistic option selection problem. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, Tome 51 (2017) no. 2, pp. 375-389. doi : 10.1051/ro/2016027. http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2016027/

W. Aertsen, V. Kint, J. Orshoven and B. Muys, Evaluation of modelling techniques for forest site productivity prediction in contrasting ecoregions using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). J. Environ. Model. Seftw. 26 (2011) 929–937. | DOI

J.J. Andreu, The remanufacturing process, Internal paper from Manchester. Metropolitan University, UK (1997).

M. Bahraminasab and A. Jahan, Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 4471–4477. | DOI

C.A. Bana E Costa, A multicriteria decision aid methodology to deal with conflicting situations on the weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26 (1986) 22–34. | DOI | MR | Zbl

A.A. Bazzazi, M. Osanloo and B. Karimi, Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods:Application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 2550–2556. | DOI

C. Cavallini, A. Giorgetti, P. Citti and F. Nicolaie, Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm. Mater. Des. 47 (2013) 7–34. | DOI

J.R. Charnetski, The multiple attribute problem with partial information: the expected value and comparative hypervolume methods. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin (1973).

J.R. Charnetski and R.M. Soland, Multiple-attribute decision making with partial information: the comparative hypervolume criterion. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 25 (1978) 279–288. | DOI | MR | Zbl

S. Corrente, J.R. Figueira and S. Greco, The SMAA-PROMETHEE methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239 (2014) 514–522. | DOI | MR | Zbl

K. Devi, Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 14163–8.

D. Dhouib, An extension of MACBETH method for a fuzzy environment to analyze alternatives in reverse logistic for automobile tire wastes. Omega 42 (2014) 25–32. | DOI

I. Durbach and S. Davis, Decision support for selecting a shortlist of electricity-saving options: A modifed SMAA approach. J. Orion 28 (2012) 99–116. | DOI

M. Ehrgott, J.R. Figueira and S. Greco, Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer (2010). | MR

R.Z. Farahani, S. Rezapour and L. Kardar, Logistic Operations and Management Concepts and Models. Elsevier (2011). | MR

A. Félix, et al., Coastal zone management with stochastic multi-criteria analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 112 (2012) 252–266. | DOI

J.R. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Survey, Springer Sciences Business Media, Inc. New York (2005). | MR | Zbl

R.J. Girubha and S. Vinodh, Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Materials and Design 37 (2012) 478–486. | DOI

C.F.S. Gomes, K.R.A. Nunes, L.H. Xavier, R. Cardoso and R. Valle, Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega 36 (2008) 395–404. | DOI

J. Hokkanen, R. Lahdelma, K. Miettinen and P. Salminen, Determining the implementation order of a general plan by using a multicriteria method. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 7 (1998) 273–284. | DOI | Zbl

J. Hokkanen, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, A multiple criteria decision model for analyzing and choosing among different development patterns for the Helsinki cargo harbor. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 33 (1999)1–23. | DOI

J. Hokkanen, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki. J. Environ. Manage. 60 (2000) 339–348. | DOI

C.H. Hsua, F.K. Wang and G.H. Tzeng, The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resources. Conservation and Recycling 66 (2012) 95–111. | DOI

A. Jahan, F. Mustapha, Md. Y. Ismail, S.M. Sapuan and M. Bahraminasab, A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 1215–21. | DOI

J. Kangas, J. Hokkanen, A. Kangas, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Applying stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis to forest ecosystem management with both cardinal and ordinal criteria. Forest Sci. 49 (2003) 928–937.

A.S. Kangas, J. Kangas, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Using SMAA-2 method with dependent uncertainties for strategic forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 9 (2006) 113–125. | DOI

T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy 35 (2010) 2517–2527. | DOI

T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 7326–33. | DOI

M.S. Kuo and G.S. Liang, Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 1304–12. | DOI

R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Oper. Res. 49 (2001) 444–454. | DOI | Zbl

R. Lahdelma and S. Salminen, Pseudo-criteria versus linear utility function in stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141 (2002) 454–469. | DOI | MR | Zbl

R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170 (2006) 241–252. | DOI | Zbl

R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Ordinal measurements with interval constraints in the EIA process for siting a waste storage area. In Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making: Application to Emerging Stressors (2008) 397–414.

R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Omega 37 (2009) 961–971. | DOI

R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, The shape of the utility or value function in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. OR Spectrum 34 (2012)785–802. | DOI | MR | Zbl

R. Lahdelma, J. Hokkanen and P. Salminen, SMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106 (1998) 137–143. | DOI

R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen, A. Simonen and J. Hokkanen, Choosing a reparation method for a landfill using the SMAA-O multicriteria method. In vol. 507 of Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millenium. Lect. Notes Econ. Math. Syst. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2001) 380–389. | Zbl

R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen and J. Hokkanen, Locating a waste treatment facility by using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis with ordinal criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142 (2002) 345–356. | DOI | Zbl

R. Lahdelma, K. Miettinen and P. Salminen, Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147 (2003) 117–127. | DOI | Zbl

J.E. Lenz, Management of production cells. Edited by Salvendy G. Handbook of Industrial Engineering, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York (1995).

J.J.H. Liou and Y.T. Chuang, Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 3755–3761. | DOI

H.C. Liu, L.X. Mao, Z.Y. Zhang and P. Li, Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 6325–38. | DOI | MR

H.C. Liu, L. Liu and J. Wu, Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Mater. Design 52 (2013) 158–167. | DOI

S. Makkonen, R. Lahdelma, A.M. Asell and A. Jokinen, Multicriteria decision support in the liberated energy market. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 12 (2003) 27–42. | DOI

A. Mehbodniya, F. Kaleem, K.K. Yen and F. Adachi, A fuzzy extension of VIKOR for target network selection in heterogeneous wireless environments. Phys. Commun. 7 (2013) 145–155. | DOI

A. Menou, A. Benallou, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Decision support for centralizing cargo at a Moroccan airport hub using stochastic multicriteria system of nanomaterials. J. Nanoparticle Res. 11 (2009) 757–766.

D.C. Morais and A.T. Almeida, Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings. Omega 40 (2012) 42–52. | DOI

D. Okul, C. Gencer, E.K. Aydogan, A method based on smaa-topsis for stochastic multi-criteria decision making and a real world application. Int. J. Inform. Tech. Decis. Making 13 (2014) 957. | DOI

S. Opricovic, A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning. Water Resour. Manage. 23 (2009) 1549–1561. | DOI

S. Opricovic, Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert. Syst. Appl. (2011) 38 12983–90. | DOI

R.K. Pati, P. Vrat and P. Kumar, A goal programming model for paper recycling system. Omega 36 (2008) 405–417. | DOI

S.D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning. A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. (2004) 365–381.

S. Opricovic and G.H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178 (2007) 514–529. | DOI | Zbl

V. Ravi, R. Shankar and M.K. Tiwari, Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistic for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48 (2005) 327–356. | DOI

L. Rocchi, Using stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis methods in SEA: an application to the Park of Trasimeno, Italy. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 55 (2012) 177–189. | DOI

S. Opricovic and G.H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156 (2004) 445–455. | DOI | Zbl

T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980). | MR | Zbl

J.R. San Cristóbal, Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. J. Renew. Energy 36 (2011) 498–502. | DOI

T. Tervonen and J.R. Figueira, A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 15 (2008) 1–14. | DOI | Zbl

T. Tervonen and R. Lahdelma, Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178 (2007) 500–513. | DOI | Zbl

T. Tervonen, J. Figueira, R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Modelling MCDA group preferences for public human resource management: evaluating the quality of education at the Department of Information Technology, the University of Turku (Finland). Research Report 22/2004 of The Institute of Systems Engineering and Computers (INESC-Coimbra), Coimbra, Portugal (2004).

T. Tervonen, G.F. Barberis, J.R. Figueira and M.E. Rodenas, Siting a university kindergarten in Madrid with SMAA-III. Working paper 12/2007 of CEG-IST. Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (2007).

T. Tervonen, H. Hakonen and R. Lahdelma, Elevator planning with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega 36 (2008) 352–362. | DOI

T. Tervonen, I. Linkov, J. Steevens, M. Chappell, J.R. Figueira and M. Merad, Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. J. Nanoparticle Res. 11 (2009) 757–766. | DOI

T. Tervonen, J.R. Figueira, R. Lahdelma, J.A. Dias and P. Salminen, A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009) 236–242. | DOI | Zbl

T. Tervonen, H.L. Hillege, E. Buskens and D. Postmus, A-State-of-the- Art Multi Criteria Model for Drug Benefit-Risk Analysis, Working Report (2010). Available at http://drugis.org/files/tervonen-antidep-SOM-final.pdf.

G.H. Tzeng and J.J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and applications. CRC Press (2011) 1–4. | MR | Zbl

S. Wadhwa, J. Madaan and F.T.S. Chan, Flexible decision modeling of reverse logistic system: a value adding MCDM approach for alternative selection. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25 (2009) 460–469. | DOI

Y.L. Wang and G.H. Tzeng, Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012) 5600–5615. | DOI

P.L. Yu, A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manage. Sci. 19 (1973) 936–946. | MR | Zbl

G.N. Yücenur and N.C. Demirel, Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012) 3702–3707. | DOI

M, Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York (1982). | Zbl

Ju and A. Wang, Extension of VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making problem with linguistic information. Appl. Math. Model. 33 (2013) 2257–2262. | MR

Cité par Sources :