no. 4
Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty
Journal de la Société française de statistique, Volume 145 (2004) no. 4, pp. 55-62
complements The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R. A. Fisher's fading influence
complemented-by Reply to comments on « The modern hypothesis testing hybrid : R.A. Fisher's fading influence » 
@article{JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0,
     author = {Lecoutre, Bruno and Poitevineau, Jacques and Lecoutre, Marie-Paule},
     title = {Discussion of {D.} {Denis.} {Fisher} : responsible, not guilty},
     journal = {Journal de la Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique},
     pages = {55--62},
     publisher = {Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique},
     volume = {145},
     number = {4},
     year = {2004},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lecoutre, Bruno
AU  - Poitevineau, Jacques
AU  - Lecoutre, Marie-Paule
TI  - Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty
JO  - Journal de la Société française de statistique
PY  - 2004
SP  - 55
EP  - 62
VL  - 145
IS  - 4
PB  - Société française de statistique
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0/
LA  - en
ID  - JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Lecoutre, Bruno
%A Poitevineau, Jacques
%A Lecoutre, Marie-Paule
%T Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty
%J Journal de la Société française de statistique
%D 2004
%P 55-62
%V 145
%N 4
%I Société française de statistique
%U https://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0/
%G en
%F JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0
Lecoutre, Bruno; Poitevineau, Jacques; Lecoutre, Marie-Paule. Discussion of D. Denis. Fisher : responsible, not guilty. Journal de la Société française de statistique, Volume 145 (2004) no. 4, pp. 55-62. https://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_55_0/

Berger J. O. (2003). Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing? [With discussion]. Statistical Science, 18, 1-32. | Zbl | MR

Berkson J. (1942). Tests of significance considered as evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 37, 325-335.

Efron B. (1998). R.A. Fisher in the 21st century [With discussion]. Statistical Science, 13, 95-122. | Zbl | MR

Fisher R. A. (1926). The Arrangement of Field Experiments. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture of Great Britain, 33, 503-513.

Fisher R. A. (1928). The Effect of Psychological Card Preferences. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 38, 269-271.

Fisher R. A. (1929). The Statistical Method in Psychical Research. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 38, 189-192.

Fisher R. A. (1958). The Nature of Probability. Centennial Review, 2, 261-274.

Fisher R. A. (1959). Smoking. The cancer controversy, Edindurgh: Oliver and Boyd.

Fisher R. A. (1962). Some examples of Bayes's method of the experimental determination of probabilities a priori. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 24, 118-124. | Zbl | MR

Goodman S. N., & Berlin J. A. (1994). The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121, 200-206.

Kruskal W. H. (1980). The significance of Fisher: A review of R.A. Fisher, the life of a scientist. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 1019-1030.

Lecoutre B. (2004). Expérimentation, inférence statistique et analyse causale. Intellectica, 38, 193-245.

Lecoutre B. (2005). The right use of interval estimates in ANOVA. Submitted for publication.

Lecoutre M.-P., Poitevineau J., & Lecoutre B. (2003). Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 37-45.

Lehmann E. L. (1993). The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: one theory or two? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1242-1249. | Zbl | MR

Morrison D. E., & Henkel R. E. (Eds.) (1970). The Significance Test Controversy - A Reader. London: Butterwoths.

Neyman J., & Pearson E. S. ( 1933a). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231, 289-337. | Zbl | JFM

Neyman J., & Pearson E. S. ( 1933b). The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 29, 492-510. | JFM

Oakes M. (1986). Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Wiley.

Perlman M. D., & Wu L. (1999). The emperor's new tests. Statistical Science, 14, 355-369. | MR

Savage L. J. (1976). On rereading R.A. Fisher [With discussion]. Annals of Statistics, 4, 441-500. | Zbl | MR

Street D. J. (1990). Fisher's contributions to agricultural statistics. Biometrics, 46, 937-945. | Zbl

Tryon W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological-methods, 6, 371-386.

Wilkinson L. and Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs (1999). Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.

Yates F. (1964). Sir Ronald Fisher and the design of experiments. Biometrics, 20, 307-321.