In this paper a ranking method using common weights methodology is presented. The goal of the method is enhancing the decision maker (DM)’s influence in the ranking procedure. Although DM’s preference information is an important element in our method, the approach can also be modified to be used in the absence of it. Since we aim to implement the approach on an empirical instance, the model is modified to deal with the properties of the sample, so it is developed in the presence of the interval data and flexible measures. Finally, the results are discussed.
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis, ranking, common set of weights, preference information
@article{RO_2022__56_6_3915_0,
author = {Ramezani-Tarkhorani, Somayeh and Eini, Mahdi},
title = {A novel ranking approach with common weights: {An} implementation in the presence of interval data and flexible measures},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {3915--3940},
year = {2022},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {56},
number = {6},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2022133},
mrnumber = {4513265},
zbl = {1536.90112},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022133/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Ramezani-Tarkhorani, Somayeh AU - Eini, Mahdi TI - A novel ranking approach with common weights: An implementation in the presence of interval data and flexible measures JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2022 SP - 3915 EP - 3940 VL - 56 IS - 6 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022133/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2022133 LA - en ID - RO_2022__56_6_3915_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Ramezani-Tarkhorani, Somayeh %A Eini, Mahdi %T A novel ranking approach with common weights: An implementation in the presence of interval data and flexible measures %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2022 %P 3915-3940 %V 56 %N 6 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022133/ %R 10.1051/ro/2022133 %G en %F RO_2022__56_6_3915_0
Ramezani-Tarkhorani, Somayeh; Eini, Mahdi. A novel ranking approach with common weights: An implementation in the presence of interval data and flexible measures. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 6, pp. 3915-3940. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022133
[1] , and , Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems. Health Care Manage. Sci. 22 (2019) 512–533. | DOI
[2] , and , A review of DEA approaches applying a common set of weights: the perspective of centralized management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 294 (2021) 3–15. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[3] , and , Robust efficiency measurement with common set of weights under varying degrees of conservatism and data uncertainty. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 10 (2016) 385–405. | DOI
[4] and , A polynomial-time algorithm for finding in DEA models. Comput. Oper. Res. 31 (2004) 803–805. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[5] and , Flexible measures in production process: a DEA-based approach. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 45 (2011) 63–74. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI
[6] , and , Classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis: a slack-based measure. Measurement 46 (2013) 4100–4107. | DOI
[7] , and , Measuring the efficiency of DMUs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[8] , , and , Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J. Econ. 46 (1990) 73–91. | Zbl | DOI
[9] , , and , Efficiency evaluation of non-homogeneous DMUs with inconsistent input quality. Comput. Ind. Eng. 158 (2021) 107418. | DOI
[10] and , A new efficiency measure for DEA: efficiency achievement measure established on fuzzy multiple objectives programming. J. Manage. 17 (2000) 369–388.
[11] , and , Determining a common set of weights in a DEA problem using a separation vector. Math. Comput. Model. 54 (2011) 2464–2470. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[12] and , Classifying inputs and outputs in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180 (2007) 692–699. | Zbl | DOI
[13] , and , A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 28 (1990) 113–124.
[14] , and , IDEA and AR-IDEA, Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manage. Sci. 45 (1999) 597–607. | Zbl | DOI
[15] , and , Combined social networks and data envelopment analysis for ranking. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2017) 990–999. | MR | Zbl
[16] , Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53 (2002) 314–323. | Zbl | DOI
[17] , Efficiency bounds and efficiency classifications in imprecise DEA: an extension. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 71 (2020) 491–504. | DOI
[18] and , A novel DEA model for solving performance measurement problems with flexible measures: an application to Tehran Stock Exchange. Measurement 179 (2021) 109444. | DOI
[19] and , A new integrated AR-IDEA model to find the best DMU in the presence of both weight restrictions and imprecise data. Comput. Ind. Eng. 125 (2018) 357–363. | DOI
[20] , , and , A novel mixed binary linear DEA model for ranking decision-making units with preference information. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149 (2020) 106720. | DOI
[21] and , Airport efficiency in Pakistan-A Data Envelopment Analysis with weight restrictions. J. Air. Transp. Manage. 69 (2018) 205–212. | DOI
[22] , The most cost efficient automotive vendor with price uncertainty: a new DEA approach. Measurement 52 (2014) 135–144. | DOI
[23] , , and , A sustainable cross-efficiency DEA model for international MSW-to-biofuel supply chain design. RAIRO: Res. Oper. 55 (2021) 2653. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI
[24] , , , and , A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Comput. Ind. Eng. 79 (2015) 195–203. | DOI
[25] , , , , and , A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis. J. Appl. Math. (2013) 20. DOI: . | DOI | MR | Zbl
[26] , and , Measuring efficiency of a recycling production system with imprecise data. Numer. Algebra Control Optim. 12 (2022) 79. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[27] and , Methods for multiple objective decision making. In: Multiple Objective Decision Making – Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1979). | DOI
[28] , , , and , Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 7483–7488. | DOI
[29] and , Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the comprise solution approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (2005) 1196–1203. | Zbl | DOI
[30] , , and , A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 213–229. | MR | Numdam | DOI
[31] and , A comprehensive common weights data envelopment analysis model, ideal and anti-ideal virtual decision making units approach. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 11 (2018) 281–306.
[32] , Finding the best asset financing alternative: a DEA–WEO approach. Measurement 55 (2014) 288–294. | DOI
[33] , Finding a common set of weights for ranking decision-making units in Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Econ. Bus. Manage. 4 (2016) 534–537.
[34] and , Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 35 (2008) 1624–1637. | Zbl | DOI
[35] , , Measuring income inequalities beyond the Gini coefficient. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2020) 561–578. | MR | DOI
[36] , , and , An assurance interval of the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 (1998) 344–347. | DOI
[37] , , , , and , Colombian higher education institutions evaluation. Soc.-Econ. Plan. Sci. 71 (2020) 100801. | DOI
[38] , Ranking via composite weighting schemes under a DEA cross-evaluation framework. Comput. Ind. Eng. 117 (2018) 217–224. | DOI
[39] and , Consistent weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244 (2015) 201–209. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[40] , , and , Ranking decision-makingunits using common weights in DEA. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2013) 3890–3896. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[41] , and , Controlling factor weighs in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans. 24 (2013) 1991.
[42] and , Common benchmarking and ranking of units with DEA. Omega 65 (2016) 1–9. | DOI
[43] , and , An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA. Measurement 93 (2016) 67–73. | DOI
[44] , and , A new robust optimization approach to common weights formulation in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (2020) 1390–1402. | DOI
[45] , , and , Group ranking of two-stage production units in network data envelopment analysis. RAIRO: Oper. Res. 55 (2021) 185. | MR | DOI
[46] and , A new method for ranking decision making units using common set of weights: a developed criterion. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 16 (2020) 633. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[47] , and , A method for evaluating the performance of decision making units with imprecise data using common set of weights. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 3 (2017) 411–423. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[48] , and , Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 6301–6310. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[49] and , An integrated data envelopment analysis and mixed integer non-linear programming model for linearizing the common set of weights. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 27 (2019) 887–904. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[50] , , and , Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 16 (1986) 35–49. | DOI
[51] and , A new non-oriented model for classifying flexible measures in DEA. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 68 (2017) 1019–1029. | DOI
[52] , Alternative solutions for classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Math. Appl. 63 (2012) 1104–1110. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[53] , The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: an extended MILP-DEA model. Measurement 46 (2013) 3628–3634. | DOI
[54] , An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA. Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2014) 3182–3192. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[55] , Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: a new DEA method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 74 (2014) 1141–1148. | DOI
[56] , A cost efficiency approach for strategic vendor selection problem under certain input prices assumption. Measurement 85 (2016) 175–183. | DOI
[57] and , A new project selection method using data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 138 (2019) 106119. | DOI
[58] and , A powerful discriminative approach for selecting the most efficient unit in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115 (2018) 269–277. | DOI
[59] , and , A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009) 8503–8508. | DOI
[60] , and , New data envelopment analysis models for classifying flexible measures: the role of non-Archimedean epsilon. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 292 (2021) 1037–1050. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[61] , and , Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis. Omega 108 (2022) 102583. | DOI
[62] , and , Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 9122–9128. | DOI
[63] , , , and , Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67 (2016) 1446–1458. | DOI
[64] , , and , Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the weight restriction approach. Math. Sci. 12 (2018) 197–203. | MR | Zbl | DOI
Cité par Sources :
