Congestion and non-congestion areas: identify and measure congestion in DEA
RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 4, pp. 2067-2092

Detecting the weak and strong congestion statuses of decision-making units (DMUs) and measuring them via data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an important issue that has been discussed in several studies and with different views. The efficiency frontier is a concept derived from the underlying production possibility set (PPS), and the congestion concept is related to them. Still, researchers have defined congestion for each DMU in many previous studies and ignored that congestion is linked with the underlying production technology. In the congestion measurement matter, this paper presents two new insights into a congestion area and non-congestion area for production technology and two new mathematical definitions of congestion based on the PPS properties and detecting the weak and strong congestion status of DMUs (CSOD). We prove our definitions are equal to the original definition of congestion. First, we describe the congestion and non-congestion areas based on the PPS; then provide full details of how to measure congestion built on these new insights. Our approaches are very accurate and fast to calculate; they are theoretically elementary and efficient in performance. Our proposed methods can deal with both non-negative and negative data. Finally, an empirical example is provided to illustrate our approaches.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2022093
Classification : 90C08, 97M40, 60K30
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis (DEA), congestion starting point (CSP), efficiency, congestion area (CA), non-congestion area (NCA), production possibility set (PPS)
@article{RO_2022__56_4_2067_0,
     author = {Moosavi, Seyed Rahim and Valami, Hadi Bagherzadeh},
     editor = {Mahjoub, A. Ridha and Laghrib, A. and Metrane, A.},
     title = {Congestion and non-congestion areas: identify and measure congestion in {DEA}},
     journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
     pages = {2067--2092},
     year = {2022},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {56},
     number = {4},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2022093},
     mrnumber = {4450248},
     zbl = {1492.90086},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022093/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Moosavi, Seyed Rahim
AU  - Valami, Hadi Bagherzadeh
ED  - Mahjoub, A. Ridha
ED  - Laghrib, A.
ED  - Metrane, A.
TI  - Congestion and non-congestion areas: identify and measure congestion in DEA
JO  - RAIRO. Operations Research
PY  - 2022
SP  - 2067
EP  - 2092
VL  - 56
IS  - 4
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022093/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2022093
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2022__56_4_2067_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Moosavi, Seyed Rahim
%A Valami, Hadi Bagherzadeh
%E Mahjoub, A. Ridha
%E Laghrib, A.
%E Metrane, A.
%T Congestion and non-congestion areas: identify and measure congestion in DEA
%J RAIRO. Operations Research
%D 2022
%P 2067-2092
%V 56
%N 4
%I EDP-Sciences
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022093/
%R 10.1051/ro/2022093
%G en
%F RO_2022__56_4_2067_0
Moosavi, Seyed Rahim; Valami, Hadi Bagherzadeh. Congestion and non-congestion areas: identify and measure congestion in DEA. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 4, pp. 2067-2092. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022093

[1] R. D. Banker, A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, Some models for the estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078–1092. | Zbl | DOI

[2] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–441. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[3] W. W. Cooper, R. G. Thompson and R. M. Thrall, Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. 66 (1996) 3–45. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[4] W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 34 (2000) 1–25. | DOI

[5] W. W. Cooper, H. Deng, B. Gu, S. Li and R. M. Thrall, Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 35 (2001) 227–242. | DOI

[6] W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, Slacks and congestion: response to a comment by R. Färe and S. Grosskopf. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 35 (2001) 205–215. | DOI

[7] W. W. Cooper, B. Gu and S. Li, Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to the treatment of congestion in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 62–74. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[8] W. W. Cooper, H. Deng, Z. M. Huang and S. X. Li, A one-model approach to congestion in data envelopment analysis. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 36 (2002) 231–238. | DOI

[9] W. W. Cooper, H. Deng, L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, Congestion: its identification and management with DEA. In: Handbook of Data Envelopment Analysis, edited by W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu. Kluwer, Boston (2004) 177–201. | Zbl | DOI

[10] R. Färe and S. Grosskopf, Measuring congestion in production. Z. Nat. 43 (1983) 257–271. | Zbl

[11] R. Färe and S. Grosskopf, Slacks and congestion: a comment. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 34 (2000) 27–33. | DOI

[12] R. Färe, L, Svensson, Congestion of production factors. Econometrica 48 (1980) 1745–1752. | Zbl | DOI

[13] R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and C. A. C. Lovell, The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer-Nijho Publishing, Boston (1985). | DOI

[14] G. R. Jahanshahloo and M. Khodabakhshi, Determining assurance interval for a non-Archimedean element in the improving outputs model in DEA. Appl. Math. Comput. 151 (2004) 501–506. | MR | Zbl

[15] M. Khodabakhshi, M. Asgharian and G. N. Gregoriou, An input-oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic DEA: evaluating chief executive officers of US public banks and thrifts. Expert Syst. App. 37 (2010) 2092–2097. | DOI

[16] M. Khoveyni, R. Eslami, M. Khodabakhshi, G. R. Jahanshahloo and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Recognizing strong and weak congestion slack based in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 64 (2013) 731–738. | DOI

[17] M. Khoveyni, R. Eslami and G. Yang, Negative data in DEA: recognizing congestion and specifying the least and the most congested decision-making units. Comput. Oper. Res. 79 (2017) 39–48. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[18] M. Mehdiloozad, S. M. Mirdehghan, B. K. Sahoo and I. Roshdi, On the identification of the global reference set in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2015) 679–688. | MR | Zbl

[19] M. Mehdiloozad, Z. Joe and B. K. Sahoo, Identification of congestion in data envelopment analysis under the occurrence of multiple projections: a reliable method capable of dealing with negative data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 265 (2019) 644–654. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[20] A. A. Noura, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, S. F. Rashidi and B. R. Parker, A new method for measuring congestion in DEA. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 2010 (2010) 240–246. | DOI

[21] T. Sueyoshi and K. Sekitani, Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: a range-adjusted measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176 (2007) 1918–1946. | Zbl | DOI

[22] T. Sueyoshi and K. Sekitani, Data envelopment analysis congestion and returns to scale under an occurrence of multiple optimal projections. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 194 (2009) 592–607. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[23] K. Tone and B. K. Sahoo, The degree of scale economies and congestion: a unified DEA approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158 (2004) 755–772. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[24] Q. L. Wei and H. Yan, Congestion and returns to scale in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 (2004) 641–660. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[25] Q. L. Wei and H. Yan, Weak congestion in output additive DEA. Soc. Econ. Planning Sci. 43 (2009) 40–54. | DOI

Cité par Sources :