This paper entails a systematic approach for measuring the Super Efficiency Scores of a set of rival firms. This evaluation process is dependent on the location of the worst Decision-Making Unit retained by the technology set. Unlike antecedent researches, the worst point is selected from a predefined neighbourhood with an application of a linear model. Finally, the new Super Efficiency model measures the Efficiency score while embedding the worst point within the direction vector. This two-stage model is akin to the standard form of a Directional Distance Function and does not end up with problems of infeasibility, negative data or zero data. In other words, the method is found robust to classify the Decision Making Units into the Super-Efficient, Strongly Efficient, Weakly Efficient and Inefficient groups. Two cases once addressed by Seiford and Zhu [INFORS 37 (1999) 174–187.] and Byrnes et al. [Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 671–681.] are illustrated here to explore the functionality of the model in comparison to a few renowned ones.
Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis, Super Efficiency Score, Directional Distance Function, infeasibility problem, neighbourhood theory
@article{RO_2021__55_6_3617_0,
author = {Sarkar, Subhadip},
title = {Performance measurement using a novel directional distance function based super efficiency model and neighbourhood theory},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {3617--3638},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {6},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2021165},
mrnumber = {4349704},
zbl = {1486.90124},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021165/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Sarkar, Subhadip TI - Performance measurement using a novel directional distance function based super efficiency model and neighbourhood theory JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 3617 EP - 3638 VL - 55 IS - 6 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021165/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2021165 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_6_3617_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Sarkar, Subhadip %T Performance measurement using a novel directional distance function based super efficiency model and neighbourhood theory %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 3617-3638 %V 55 %N 6 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021165/ %R 10.1051/ro/2021165 %G en %F RO_2021__55_6_3617_0
Sarkar, Subhadip. Performance measurement using a novel directional distance function based super efficiency model and neighbourhood theory. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 6, pp. 3617-3638. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021165
[1] and , A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1264. | Zbl | DOI
[2] , and , Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons (2006). | MR | Zbl
[3] , and , Measuring productive efficiency: An application to Illinois strip mines. Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 671–681. | Zbl | DOI
[4] , and , Benefit and distance functions. J. Econ. Theory 70 (1996) 407–419. | Zbl | DOI
[5] , and , Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[6] , Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 161 (2005) 545–551. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[7] , and , Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function. Omega 41 (2013) 621–625. | DOI
[8] and , Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 213 (2011) 359–360. | Zbl | DOI
[9] , , and , A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60 (2009) 276–281. | Zbl | DOI
[10] and , Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making. Omega 21 (1993) 713–715. | DOI
[11] and , Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994) 567–578. | Zbl | DOI
[12] , , , and , Additive super-efficiency in integer-valued data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012) 186–192. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[13] , and , A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200 (2010) 297–304. | Zbl | DOI
[14] and , Super-efficiency of education institutions: an application to economics departments. Edu. Econ. 26 (2018) 610–623. | DOI
[15] and , A new super-efficiency model in the presence of negative data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (2013) 396–401. | DOI
[16] , and , Dealing with interval-scale data in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 137 (2002) 22–27. | Zbl | DOI
[17] , and , Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 212 (2011) 141–147. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[18] and , Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216 (2012) 429–433. | Zbl | DOI
[19] and , Super-efficiency measurement under variable return to scale: an approach based on a new directional distance function. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (2015) 1506–1510. | DOI
[20] and , A directional distance-based super-efficiency DEA model handling negative data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 68 (2017) 1312–1322. | DOI
[21] and , Super-efficiency based on the directional distance function in the presence of negative data. Omega 85 (2019) 26–34. | DOI
[22] and , Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54 (2003) 101–108. | Zbl | DOI
[23] and , Modified semi-oriented Radial Measure for measuring the efficiency of DMUs. In: With 3rd Operation, Research Conference. (2010).
[24] , Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: a generalization. Ann. Oper. Res. 66 (1996) 93–102. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[25] , and , Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004) 1111–1121. | Zbl | DOI
[26] , The directional distance function and measurement of super-efficiency: an application to airlines data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59 (2008) 788–797. | Zbl | DOI
[27] and , Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFORS 37 (1999) 174–187. | Zbl
[28] , and , A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (2007) 1–6.
[29] , Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision-making – a response. Omega 22 (1994) 205–206. | DOI
[30] , Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. 66 (1996) 109–138. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[31] , Improving discernment in DEA using profiling. Omega 24 (1996) 361–364. | DOI
[32] , A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143 (2002) 32–41. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[33] and , Note: ranking DMUs with infeasible super-efficiency DEA models. Manage. Sci. 48 (2002) 705–710. | Zbl | DOI
[34] and , A unified extension of super-efficiency in additive data envelopment analysis with integer-valued inputs and outputs: an application to a municipal bus system. Ann. Oper. Res. 287 (2020) 515–535. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[35] , Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996) 451–460. | Zbl | DOI
[36] , Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129 (2001) 443–455. | MR | Zbl | DOI
Cité par Sources :





