In this race for productivity, the most successful leaders in the banking industry are those with high-efficiency and a competitive edge. Data envelopment analysis is one of the most widely used methods for measuring efficiency in organizations. In this study, we use the ideal point concept and propose a common weights model with fuzzy data and non-discretionary inputs. The proposed model considers environmental criteria with uncertain data to produce a full ranking of homogenous decision-making units. We use the proposed model to investigate the efficiency-based leaders in the Russian banking industry. The results show that the unidimensional and unilateral assessment of leading organizations solely according to corporate size is insufficient to characterize industry leaders effectively. In response, we recommend a multilevel, multicomponent, and multidisciplinary evaluation framework for a more reliable and realistic investigation of leadership at the network level of analysis.
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis, common weights, leadership, ideal point, fuzzy data, non-discretionary inputs, efficiency
@article{RO_2021__55_1_213_0,
author = {Kazemi, Sajad and Tavana, Madjid and Toloo, Mehdi and Zenkevich, Nikolay A.},
title = {A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {213--229},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2020143},
mrnumber = {4228692},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020143/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Kazemi, Sajad AU - Tavana, Madjid AU - Toloo, Mehdi AU - Zenkevich, Nikolay A. TI - A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 213 EP - 229 VL - 55 IS - 1 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020143/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2020143 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_1_213_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Kazemi, Sajad %A Tavana, Madjid %A Toloo, Mehdi %A Zenkevich, Nikolay A. %T A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 213-229 %V 55 %N 1 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020143/ %R 10.1051/ro/2020143 %G en %F RO_2021__55_1_213_0
Kazemi, Sajad; Tavana, Madjid; Toloo, Mehdi; Zenkevich, Nikolay A. A common weights model for investigating efficiency-based leadership in the russian banking industry. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 1, pp. 213-229. doi: 10.1051/ro/2020143
[1] , , and , Putting emergence back in leadership emergence: a dynamic, multilevel, process-oriented framework. Leadership Q. 30 (2019) 145–164. | DOI
[2] and , Bank branch efficiency under environmental change: a bootstrap DEA on monthly profit and loss accounting statements of Greek retail branches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261 (2017) 1170–1188. | DOI
[3] and , A polynomial-time algorithm for finding epsilon in DEA models. Comput. Oper. Res. 31 (2004) 803–805. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[4] and , A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1264. | Zbl | DOI
[5] , Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. Am. Psychol. 62 (2007) 25–33. | DOI
[6] , and , A new fuzzy additive model for determining the common set of weights in Data Envelopment Analysis. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30 (2016) 61–69. | DOI
[7] and , Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 34 (1986) 513–521. | Zbl | DOI
[8] and , Banking efficiency in Brazil. J. Int. Financial Markets Inst. Money 28 (2014) 54–65. | DOI
[9] , Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership., Free Press, New York (1990).
[10] , Income smoothing: the role of management. Acc. Rev. 48 (1973) 653–667.
[11] , and , Deterministic parametric and nonparametric estimation of efficiency in service production: a comparison. J. Econ. 46 (1990) 213–227. | DOI
[12] , and , Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[13] , , and , Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1994) 1–528. | Zbl
[14] , Fuzzy system reliability analysis using fuzzy number arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 66 (1994) 31–38. | MR | DOI
[15] , and , Determining a common set of weights in a DEA problem using a separation vector. Math. Comput. Model. 54 (2011) 2464–2470. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[16] , and , Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 59 (1992) 319–323. | Zbl | DOI
[17] , and , Data envelopment analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47 (1996) 945–953. | Zbl | DOI
[18] and , Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and improving container port efficiency. Res. Transp. Econ. 17 (2007) 517–566. | DOI
[19] , and , Performance implications of transformational supply chain leadership and followership. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 40 (2010) 763–779. | DOI
[20] , and , Measuring the performance of hierarchical organizations: an application to bank efficiency at the regional and branch levels. Manage. Acc. Res. 25 (2014) 30–44. | DOI
[21] and , The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Soc. Rev. 48 (1983) 147–160. | DOI
[22] , and , The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: a non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong’s banking system. J. Banking Finance 40 (2006) 1443–1466. | DOI
[23] and , Evolution of the supply chain in the Italian railway industry. Suppl. Chain Manage. 14 (2009) 303–313. | DOI
[24] , and , Two-stage DEA-Truncated Regression: application in banking efficiency and financial development. Expert Syst. App. 96 (2018) 284–301. | DOI
[25] and , Following or running away from the market leader? The influences of environmental uncertainty and market leadership. Eur. Manage. Rev. 15 (2018) 445–463. | DOI
[26] and , Analysing banks’ intermediation and operating efficiencies using the two-stage network DEA model. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 66 (2017) 500–516. | DOI
[27] , and , A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 214 (2011) 457–472. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[28] , , , and , A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Comput. Ind. Eng. 79 (2015) 195–203. | DOI
[29] and , Modes of interorganizational imitation: the effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Q. 42 (1997) 472–500. | DOI
[30] , , and , Searching for outcomes of leadership: a 25-year review. J. Manage. 37 (2011) 1137–1177.
[31] and , Resolving the deposit dilemma: a new DEA bank efficiency model. J. Banking Finance 35 (2011) 2801–2810. | DOI
[32] , , and , First financial restructuring and operating efficiency: evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks. J. Banking Finance 34 (2010) 1461–1471. | DOI
[33] , and , Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: an extended DEA approach. Omega 35 (2007) 578–587. | DOI
[34] , and , An extension from network DEA to Copula-based network SFA: evidence from the U.S. commercial banks in 2009. Q. Rev. Econ Finance 67 (2018) 51–62. | DOI
[35] , Data Envelopment Analysis and non-discretionary inputs: How to select the most suitable model using multi-criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst. App. 42 (2015) 2570–2581. | DOI
[36] , , and , A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007) 331–337. | Zbl | DOI
[37] , , , and , Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights. Expert Syst. App. 37 (2010) 7483–7488. | DOI
[38] , , and , Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87 (2002) 765–780. | DOI
[39] , and , Integrated framework for robustness analysis using ratio-based efficiency model with application to evaluation of Polish airports. Omega 67 (2017) 1–18. | DOI
[40] , and , A directional semi-oriented radial DEA measure: an application on financial stability and the efficiency of banks. Ann. Oper. Res. 264 (2018) 213–234. | MR | DOI
[41] , , and , Assessing the domestic and foreign Islamic banks efficiency: insights from selected Southeast Asian countries. Future Bus. J. 3 (2017) 33–46. | DOI
[42] and , Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (2005) 1196–1203. | Zbl | DOI
[43] , , and , Research on competitive dynamics: recent accomplishments and future challenges. J. Manage. 30 (2004) 779–804.
[44] , and , Developing common set of weights with considering nondiscretionary inputs and using ideal point method. J. Appl. Math. 2013 (2013) 1–9. | MR | DOI
[45] and , Failure prediction in the Russian bank sector with logit and trait recognition models. Expert Syst. App. 30 (2006) 463–478. | DOI
[46] and , Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega 52 (2015) 33–41. | DOI
[47] , , , and , Two-stage network DEA: Who is the leader? Omega 74 (2018) 15–19. | DOI
[48] and , Why do firms imitate each other?. Acad. Manage. Rev. 31 (2006) 366–385. | DOI
[49] and , First-mover advantages. Strategic Manage. J. 9 (1988) 41–58. | DOI
[50] and , Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 35 (2008) 1624–1637. | Zbl | DOI
[51] , , , and , Leadership in applied psychology: three waves of theory and research. J. Appl. Psychol. 102 (2017) 434–451. | DOI
[52] , and , An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. J. Prod. Anal. 18 (2002) 59–77. | DOI
[53] , , and , Supplier innovation strategy and performance: a matter of supply chain market positioning. Decis. Sci. 49 (2018) 660–689. | DOI
[54] and , Bank ownership and cost efficiency: new empirical evidence from Russia. Econ. Syst. 41 (2017) 305–319. | DOI
[55] , Risk management and managerial efficiency in Chinese banks: a network DEA framework. Omega 41 (2013) 207–215. | DOI
[56] and , The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Q. 44 (1999) 653–683. | DOI
[57] and , Stochastic data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 251 (2016) 2–21. | MR | DOI
[58] and , Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: a DEA analysis with regression-based feedback. Ann. Oper. Res. 266 (2018) 551–587. | MR | DOI
[59] and , A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega 41 (2013) 61–79. | DOI
[60] , Common set of weights approach in fuzzy DEA with an application. J. Intel. Fuzzy Syst. 29 (2015) 187–194. | MR | DOI
[61] , Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, New York (1980).
[62] and , A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India. Expert Syst. App. 41 (2014) 6419–6432. | DOI
[63] , On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996) 553–565. | Zbl | DOI
[64] , Nondiscretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111 (1998) 461–469. | Zbl | DOI
[65] , and , Efficiency analysis and ranking of DMUs with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 1 (2002) 255–267. | Zbl | DOI
[66] , , , and , A common set of weight approach using an ideal decision-making unit in data envelopment analysis. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 8 (2012) 623–637. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[67] and , In the determination of the most efficient decision making unit in data envelopment analysis: a comment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 104 (2017) 216–218. | DOI
[68] , IT alignment in supply chain relationships: a study of supplier benefits. J. Suppl. Chain Manage. 41 (2005) 4–13. | DOI
[69] and , Measuring the true managerial efficiency of bank branches in Taiwan: a three-stage DEA analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012) 11494–11502. | DOI
[70] , , and , A comparison of DEA and SFA using micro- and macro-level perspectives: efficiency of Chinese local banks. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. App. 469 (2017) 216–223. | DOI
[71] , Comparison and evaluation of bank efficiency in selected countries in EU. Proc. Econ. Finance 12 (2014) 644–653. | DOI
[72] , and , King of the hill: dethroning the industry leader. Acad. Manage. Executive 15 (2001) 59–70.
[73] , and , Computational and theoretical pitfalls in some current performance measurement techniques and a new approach. Appl. Math. Comput. 181 (2006) 1199–1207. | MR | Zbl
[74] , and , Cost efficiency of the banking industry in the South Eastern European region. J. Int. Financial Markets Inst. Money 18 (2008) 483–497. | DOI
[75] , and , Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights. App. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 6301–6310. | MR | DOI
[76] , and , A stochastic data envelopment analysis model using a common set of weights and the ideal point concept. Int. J. Appl. Manage. Sci. 7 (2015) 81–92. | DOI
[77] , , , and , Efficiency decomposition and measurement in two-stage fuzzy DEA models using a bargaining game approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 118 (2018) 394–408. | DOI
[78] , Selecting and full ranking suppliers with imprecise data: a new DEA method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 74 (2014) 1141–1148. | DOI
[79] , Alternative minimax model for finding the most efficient unit in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 81 186–194. | DOI
[80] and , The most cost efficient automotive vendor with price uncertainty: a new DEA approach. Measurement 52 (2014) 135–144. | DOI
[81] and , Finding the best asset financing alternative: a DEA-WEO approach. Measurement 55 (2014) 288–294. | DOI
[82] and , A powerful discriminative approach for selecting the most efficient unit in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115 (2018) 269–277. | DOI
[83] and , Two alternative approaches for selecting performance measures in data envelopment analysis. Measurement 65 (2015) 29–40. | DOI
[84] , and , Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Q. 18 (2007) 298–318. | DOI
[85] , and , A generic approach to measuring the machine flexibility of manufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186 (2008) 137–149. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[86] , and , Common weights for fully ranking decision-making units by regression analysis. Expert Syst. App. 38 (2011) 9122–9128. | DOI
[87] , and , A fuzzy multi-objective two-stage DEA model for evaluating the performance of US bank holding companies. Expert Syst. App. 41 (2014) 4290–4297. | DOI
[88] , , , , Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega 44 (2014) 5–20. | DOI
[89] and , Two-stage DEA: an application to major Brazilian banks. Expert Syst. App. 41 (2014) 2337–2344. | DOI
[90] , and , Assessing productive efficiency of banks using integrated fuzzy-DEA and bootstrapping: a case of Mozambican Banks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249 (2016) 378–389. | DOI
[91] , and , Performance based clustering for benchmarking of container ports: an application of DEA and cluster analysis technique. Int. J. Comput. Intel. Syst. 3 (2010) 709–722.
[92] , Leadership in Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2001).
[93] , Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8 (1965) 338–353. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[94] , , and , Aggregating preference ranking with fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Knowl.-Based Syst. 23 (2010) 512–519. | DOI
[95] , , and , Market concentration risk-taking and bank performance: evidence from emerging economies International. Rev. Financial Anal. 30 (2013) 149–157. | DOI
[96] and , Banking Performance Evaluation in China based on non-radial super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance 23 (2015) 197–202. | DOI
[97] , , , and , Data envelopment analysis for bi-level systems with multiple followers. Omega 77 (2018) 180–188. | DOI
[98] , , , , and , Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: a multi-period three-stage DEA model. Omega 85 (2019) 68–82. | DOI
[99] , , , Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: the case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269 (2018) 99–110. | MR | DOI
Cité par Sources :
