Mathematical framework for current density imaging due to discharge of electro-muscular disruption devices
ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique, Volume 41 (2007) no. 3, p. 447-459

Electro-muscular disruption (EMD) devices such as TASER M26 and X26 have been used as a less-than-lethal weapon. Such EMD devices shoot a pair of darts toward an intended target to generate an incapacitating electrical shock. In the use of the EMD device, there have been controversial questions about its safety and effectiveness. To address these questions, we need to investigate the distribution of the current density $J$ inside the target produced by the EMD device. One approach is to develop a computational model providing a quantitative and reliable analysis about the distribution of $J$. In this paper, we set up a mathematical model of a typical EMD shock, bearing in mind that we are aiming to compute the current density distribution inside the human body with a pair of inserted darts. The safety issue of TASER is directly related to the magnitude of $|J|$ at the region of the darts where the current density $J$ is highly concentrated. Hence, fine computation of $J$ near the dart is essential. For such numerical simulations, serious computational difficulties are encountered in dealing with the darts having two different very sharp corners, tip of needle and tip of barb. The boundary of a small fishhook-shaped dart inside a large computational domain and the presence of corner singularities require a very fine mesh leading to a formidable amount of numerical computations. To circumvent these difficulties, we developed a multiple point source method of computing $J$. It has a potential to provide effective analysis and more accurate estimate of $J$ near fishhook-shaped darts. Numerical experiments show that the MPSM is just fit for the study of EMD shocks.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an:2007030
Classification:  93A30,  32S05,  92C55,  33K28,  35M10,  35R30
Keywords: electro-muscular disruption (EMD) device, electrical current density, Maxwell equations, non-smooth boundary, elliptic partial differential equations, corner singularity
@article{M2AN_2007__41_3_447_0,
author = {Lee, Jeehyun and Seo, Jin Keun and Woo, Eung Je},
title = {Mathematical framework for current density imaging due to discharge of electro-muscular disruption devices},
journal = {ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Mod\'elisation Math\'ematique et Analyse Num\'erique},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {41},
number = {3},
year = {2007},
pages = {447-459},
doi = {10.1051/m2an:2007030},
zbl = {pre05289380},
mrnumber = {2355707},
language = {en},
url = {http://www.numdam.org/item/M2AN_2007__41_3_447_0}
}

Lee, Jeehyun; Seo, Jin Keun; Woo, Eung Je. Mathematical framework for current density imaging due to discharge of electro-muscular disruption devices. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis - Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique, Volume 41 (2007) no. 3, pp. 447-459. doi : 10.1051/m2an:2007030. http://www.numdam.org/item/M2AN_2007__41_3_447_0/

[1] G. Alessandrini and R. Magnanini, The index of isolated critical points and solutions of elliptic equations in the plane. Ann. Scoula. Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 19 (1992) 567-589. | Numdam | Zbl 0793.35021

[2] G. Alessandrini, E. Rosset and J.K. Seo, Optimal size estimates for the inverse conductivity poblem with one measurement. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000) 53-64. | Zbl 0944.35108

[3] Amnesty International, Internet site address: http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engamr510302006

[4] M. Cheney, D. Isaacson and J.C. Newell, Electrical impedance tomography. SIAM Rev. 41 (1999) 85-101. | Zbl 0927.35130

[5] V. Isakov, On uniqueness of recovery of a discontinuous conductivity coefficient. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (1988) 856-877. | Zbl 0676.35082

[6] P.J. Kim and W.H. Franklin, Ventricular Fibrillation after Stun-Gun Discharge. N. Engl. J. Med. 353 (2005) 958-959.

[7] S.W. Kim, O. Kwon, J.K. Seo and J.R. Yoon, On a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 34 (2002) 511-526. | Zbl 1055.35142

[8] Y.J. Kim, O. Kwon, J.K. Seo and E.J. Woo, Uniqueness and convergence of conductivity image reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 19 (2003) 1213-1225. | Zbl 1054.35134

[9] R. Kohn and M. Vogelius, Determining conductivity by boundary measurements. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984) 113-123. | Zbl 0573.35084

[10] O. Kwon, E. Woo, J.R. Yoon and J.K. Seo, Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 (2002) 160-167.

[11] D. Laur, Excited delirium and its correlation to sudden and unexpected death proximal to restraint (Canada: Victoria Police Department) http://www.taser.com/facts/medical_info.htm (2004).

[12] B.I. Lee, S.H. Oh, E.J. Woo, S.Y. Lee, M.H. Cho, O. Kwon, J.K. Seo and W.S. Baek, Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). Physiol. Meas. 24 (2003) 579-589.

[13] D.K. Mcbride and N.B. Tedder, Efficacy and Safety of Electrical Stun Devices, A Potomac Institute for Policy Studies Report: No. 05 . 04, http://www.potomacinstitute.com/research/Stun%20Devices%20Report_FINAL.pdf (2005).

[14] W.C. Mcdaniel, R.A. Stratbucker, M. Nerheim and J.E. Brewer, Cardiac Safety of Neuromuscular Incapacitating Defensive Devices. PACE Supplement 1 (2005) 284-287.

[15] P. Metherall, D.C. Barber, R.H. Smallwood and B.H. Brown, Three Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography. Nature 380 (1996) 509-512.

[16] A. Nachman, Reconstructions from boundary measurements. Ann. Math. 128 (1988) 531-577. | Zbl 0675.35084

[17] S.H. Oh, B.I. Lee, E.J. Woo, S.Y. Lee, M.H. Cho, O. Kwon and J.K. Seo, Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic ${B}_{z}$ algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 3101-3016.

[18] S.H. Oh, B.I. Lee, S.Y. Lee, E.J. Woo, M.H. Cho, O. Kwon and J.K. Seo, Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: phantom experiments using a 3.0 Tesla MRI system. Magn. Reson. Med. 51 (2004) 1292-1296.

[19] C. Park, O. Kwon, E.J. Woo and J.K. Seo, Electrical conductivity imaging using gradient ${B}_{z}$ decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 23 (2004) 388-394.

[20] J.S. Park, M.S. Chung, S.B. Hwang, Y.S. Lee, D.H. Har and H.S. Park, Visible Korean Human: Improved Serially Sectioned Images of the Entire Body. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 24 (2005) 352-360.

[21] F. Santosa and M. Vogelius, A backprojection algorithm for electrical impedance imaging. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50 (1990) 216-243. | Zbl 0691.65087

[22] G.C. Scott, M.L.G. Joy, R.L. Armstrong and R.M. Henkelman, Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 10 (1991) 362-374.

[23] J.K. Seo, A uniqueness results on inverse conductivity problem with two measurements. J. Fourier Anal. App. 2 (1996) 515-524.

[24] J.K. Seo, J.R. Yoon, E.J. Woo and O. Kwon, Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 (2003) 1121-1124.

[25] J.K. Seo, O. Kwon, B.I. Lee and E.J. Woo, Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: computer simulation study. Physiol. Meas. 24 (2003) 565-577.

[26] J. Sylvester and G. Uhlmann, A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem. Ann. Math. 125 (1987) 153-169. | Zbl 0625.35078

[27] Taser M26 and X26 manuals, http://www.taser.com/index.htm

[28] G. Verchota, Layer potentials and boundary value problems for Laplace's equation in Lipschitz domains. J. Func. Anal. 59 (1984) 572-611. | Zbl 0589.31005

[29] J.G. Webster, Electromuscular Incapacitating Devices. Proc. IFMBE 2005 9 (2005) 150-151.