Considering the two-stage supply chain composed of a leading retailer and a manufacturer under the background of covid-19 epidemic, the retailer determines the anti-epidemic effort level and bears the corresponding costs, and the manufacturer determines the cost sharing rate under the coordination strategy. This paper analyzes the pricing decision, anti-epidemic effort level and cost sharing rate of supply chain under different government subsidy measures and coordination strategies. From the perspective of Stackelberg game, we find that under the background of epidemic situation, government subsidies can improve the level of social welfare; the improvement of marginal income of anti-epidemic efforts is conducive to obtain a higher level of anti-epidemic efforts and social welfare; Within the reasonable marginal revenue range of anti-epidemic efforts, the coordination strategy can improve the retailers’ anti-epidemic efforts and social welfare level, and the government can obtain the maximum anti-epidemic efforts and social welfare level by subsidizing manufacturers with cost sharing.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2021089
Keywords: COVID-19, government subsidy, supply chain management, coordination
@article{RO_2021__55_3_1885_0,
author = {Yang, Sen and Qian, Wuyong},
title = {Effect of government subsidies on supply chain decision-making and coordination in the context of {COVID-19}},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {1885--1907},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2021089},
mrnumber = {4275487},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021089/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Yang, Sen AU - Qian, Wuyong TI - Effect of government subsidies on supply chain decision-making and coordination in the context of COVID-19 JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 1885 EP - 1907 VL - 55 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021089/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2021089 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_3_1885_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Yang, Sen %A Qian, Wuyong %T Effect of government subsidies on supply chain decision-making and coordination in the context of COVID-19 %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 1885-1907 %V 55 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021089/ %R 10.1051/ro/2021089 %G en %F RO_2021__55_3_1885_0
Yang, Sen; Qian, Wuyong. Effect of government subsidies on supply chain decision-making and coordination in the context of COVID-19. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 3, pp. 1885-1907. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021089
[1] , , and , Fiscal responses to the covid-19 crisis in Japan: the first six months. Nat. Tax J. 73 (2020) 901–926. | DOI
[2] and , Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms incentives for technology licensing. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 293–308. | DOI
[3] and , Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: individual or collective producer responsibility? Prod. Oper. Manage. 21 (2012) 1042–1059. | DOI
[4] , and , Efficient take-back legislation. Prod. Oper. Manage. 18 (2009) 243–258. | DOI
[5] , and , Research on the influence of different government subsidy strategies on the green decision-making of supply chain. Chin. J. Manage. 16 (2019) 297–305+316.
[6] , , , et al. A three-layer supply chain inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating item with inflation and delay in payments in random fuzzy environment[J]. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 34 (2017) 407–424.
[7] and , Implementing market segmentation using full-refund and no-refund customer returns policies in a dual-channel supply chain structure. Int J. Prod. Econ. 136 (2012) 56–66. | DOI
[8] and , Social welfare maximization with the least subsidy: photovoltaic supply chain equilibrium and coordination with fairness concern. Renew. Energy 132 (2019) 1332–1347. | DOI
[9] , and , Inter-basin water transfer supply chain equilibrium and coordination: a social welfare maximization perspective. Water Res. Manage. 33 (2019) 2577–2598. | DOI
[10] , and , The impact of government subsidy on supply chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 86 (2019) 42–58. | DOI
[11] , , and , Optimal production, pricing and government subsidy policies for a closed loop supply chain with uncertain returns. J. Ind. Manage. Optim. 13 (2020) 1. | MR
[12] , Innovative Bring-Service-Near-Your-Home Operations under Corona-Virus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak: can logistics become the messiah? Transp. Res. Part E-Logistics Transp. Rev. 140 (2020) 101961. | DOI
[13] , and , Liability cost sharing, product quality choice, and coordination in two-echelon supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284 (2020) 514–537. | MR | DOI
[14] , , , et al. Supply chain coordination for false failure returns. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 8 (2006) 376–393. | DOI
[15] and , Multi-objective linear fractional inventory model with possibility and necessity constraints under generalised intuitionistic fuzzy set environment[J]. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 4 (2019) P175–P181. | DOI
[16] , and , Fully fuzzy inventory model with price-dependent demand and time varying holding cost under fuzzy decision variables[J]. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36 (2019) 3725–3738. | DOI
[17] and , Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 319–329. | DOI
[18] , and , A decision support system for demand management in healthcare supply chains considering the epidemic outbreaks: a case study of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Transp. Res. Part E-Logistics Transp. Rev. 138 (2020) 101967. | DOI
[19] , , and , Decision and coordination of low-carbon e-commerce supply chain with government carbon subsidies and fairness concerns. Complexity 2020 (2020) 1–19. | DOI
[20] , and , The effects of government subsidies on decentralised reverse supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (2016) 3962–3977. | DOI
[21] , and , Optimal operational strategies of supply chain under financing service by a 3PL firm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 3405–3420. | DOI
[22] , and , Analysis of government differential weight subsidy in an emerging coastal industry supply chain. J. Coastal Res. 94 (2019) 851–858. | DOI
[23] , , and , Government subsidy provision in biomass energy supply chains. Enterprise Inf. Syst. 13 (2019) 1367–1391. | DOI
[24] , , , , and , Improving supply chain sustainability in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: exploring drivers using an integrated model. Sustainable Prod. Consump. 26 (2021) 411–427. | DOI
[25] , and , Managing medication supply chains: lessons learned from Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic and preparedness planning for the future. J. Am. Pharmacists Assoc. 61 (2021) e12–e15. | DOI
[26] , and , Study on longitudinal emission reduction investment of supply chain and government’s subsidy policy. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 34 (2018) 1177–1186. | DOI
[27] , and , Using system dynamics and game model to estimate optimal subsidy in shore power technology. IEEE Access 8 (2020) 116310–116320. | DOI
[28] , , and , Ripple effect in the supply chain network: forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 291 (2021) 1117–1131. | DOI
[29] , The impact of COVID-19 on transport volume and freight capacity dynamics: an empirical analysis in German food retail logistics. Transp. Res. Interdisciplinary Perspect. 6 (2020) 100165. | DOI
[30] , and , Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226 (2013) 221–227. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[31] , and , COVID-19 debunks the myth of socially sustainable supply chain: a case of the clothing industry in South Asian Countries. Sustainable Prod. Consump. 24 (2020) 150–155. | DOI
[32] , , and , How different government subsidy objects impact on green supply chain decision considering consumer group complexity. Math. Prob. Eng. 2020 (2020) 1–12. | MR | DOI
[33] Ministry of Power. National Ujala Dashboard jEESL Retrieved November 19, 2017, from http://www.ujala.gov.in/.
[34] Municipal notice on novel Coronavirus Infected pneumonia Epidemic Prevention and control Headquarters. Retrieved from http://www.wh.gov.cn/sy/whyw/202003/t20200316_960171.shtml.
[35] and , An analysis on the panic during COVID-19 pandemic through an online form. J. Affective Disorders 276 (2020) 14–22. | DOI
[36] and , Rising concerns over agricultural production as COVID-19 spreads: lessons from China. Global Food Secur. 26 (2020) 100409. | DOI
[37] and , Coordinating pricing and supply of public interest goods using government rebates and subsidies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 62 (2015) 65–79. | DOI
[38] Real-time big data reporting on COVID-19. Retrieved from https://voice.baidu.com/act/newpneumonia/newpneumonia/?from=osari_pc_3.
[39] , , and , Safety of foods, food supply chain and environment within the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 102 (2020) 293–299. | DOI
[40] and , Challenges and solutions for addressing critical shortage of supply chain for personal and protective equipment (PPE) arising from Coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic – Case study from the Republic of Ireland. Sci. Total Environ. 725 (2020) 138532. | DOI
[41] , and , Covid-19’s impact on supply chain decisions: strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data. J. Bus. Res. 117 (2020) 443–449. | DOI
[42] , and , Green supply chain decisions considering consumers’ low-carbon awareness under different government subsidies. Sustainability 12 (2020) 2281. | DOI
[43] , , and , Evolutionary game of the green investment in a two-echelon supply chain under a government subsidy mechanism. J. Cleaner Prod. 235 (2019) 1315–1326. | DOI
[44] , and , Impact of government subsidies on pricing strategies in reverse supply chains of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manage. 95 (2019) 440–449. | DOI
[45] , Governmental subsidy policy for enterprises’ cooperative behavior in emission reduction in low-carbon supply chain. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 23 (2014) 1–11.
Cité par Sources :
