This paper establishes centralized decision-making models (CDMM) and decentralized decision-making models (DCDMM) for a two-echelon logistics service supply chain (LSSC) composed of an integrator and a functional provider. This takes into consideration implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR). The equilibrium decisions are obtained and the impacts of CSR on the price, service level, consumer surplus, profit, and utility of the LSSC are discussed. A newly designed two-part pricing contract ensures implementation of CSR. We demonstrate that (1) under DCDMM, improvement of the functional provider’s CSR has more positive effects on the level of service, market demand, consumer surplus, overall profit, and utility of the LSSC than the same level of CSR for an integrator. (2) An increase of one member’s CSR upgrades the profit of the other members but damages its own profits. Therefore, LSSC members’ final profits will depend on the influence of CSR on both sides. (3) There is an optimal total critical CSR value for an integrator and functional provider. If the sum of both CSR values exceeds this, the profit under CDMM will be less than that under DCDMM, and LSSC members need not implement contract coordination. Finally, a numerical example is used to verify the relevant conclusions.
Keywords: Logistics service supply chain, CSR behavior, supply chain coordination, two-part pricing contract
@article{RO_2022__56_4_2595_0,
author = {Liu, Junhua and Liu, Xiaoli and Wang, Fu and Ma, Xuejiao and Yue, Xiaohang},
title = {Equilibrium decisions and coordination of a logistics service supply chain with bilateral corporate social responsibility},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {2595--2612},
year = {2022},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {56},
number = {4},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2022115},
mrnumber = {4469507},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022115/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Liu, Junhua AU - Liu, Xiaoli AU - Wang, Fu AU - Ma, Xuejiao AU - Yue, Xiaohang TI - Equilibrium decisions and coordination of a logistics service supply chain with bilateral corporate social responsibility JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2022 SP - 2595 EP - 2612 VL - 56 IS - 4 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022115/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2022115 LA - en ID - RO_2022__56_4_2595_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Liu, Junhua %A Liu, Xiaoli %A Wang, Fu %A Ma, Xuejiao %A Yue, Xiaohang %T Equilibrium decisions and coordination of a logistics service supply chain with bilateral corporate social responsibility %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2022 %P 2595-2612 %V 56 %N 4 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022115/ %R 10.1051/ro/2022115 %G en %F RO_2022__56_4_2595_0
Liu, Junhua; Liu, Xiaoli; Wang, Fu; Ma, Xuejiao; Yue, Xiaohang. Equilibrium decisions and coordination of a logistics service supply chain with bilateral corporate social responsibility. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 4, pp. 2595-2612. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022115
[1] , and , Channel coordination with manufacturer’s return policies within a newsvendor framework. 4OR-Q. J Oper. Res. 9 (2011) 279–297. | MR | DOI
[2] , Measuring sustainable development efficiency of urban logistics industry. Math. Probl. Eng. 1 (2018) 1–9. | DOI
[3] , , and , Coordination strategies for dual-channel supply chain of fresh agricultural products considering the fresh-keeping effort of supplier. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 29 (2021) 109–118.
[4] and , Logistics social responsibility: an integrative framework. J. Bus. Logist. 23 (2002) 145–180. | DOI
[5] , and , Logistics social responsibility: standard adoption and practices in ltalian companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113 (2008) 88–106. | DOI
[6] , , , , and , Can social protection improve sustainable development goals for adolescent health? PLoS One 11 (2016) 1–20. | DOI
[7] , , and , The optimal strategies in a product service supply chain with product quality and service level affecting sales. In: 8th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS). Toronto (2018).
[8] , and , Coordination and price strategy for logistics service supply chains to perform corporate social responsibilities. Control. Decis. 31 (2016) 2287–2292.
[9] , Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Ballinger, Boston, Pitman (1984).
[10] , , and , Online selling mode choice and pricing in an O2O tourism supply chain considering corporate social responsibility. Electron. Commer. R. A. 38 (2019) 1–13.
[11] , , and , Corporate social responsibility and external stakeholders’ health and wellbeing: a viewpoint. J. Public. Health. Res. 9 (2020) 27–30. | DOI
[12] , and , Tri-party reverse supply chain coordination with competitive product acquisition process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1 (2020) 1–12.
[13] and , Coordination contract for a competitive pharmaceutical supply chain considering corporate social responsibility and pricing decisions. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 1515–1535. | MR | Numdam | DOI
[14] , , and , Investigating the impact factors of the logistics service supply chain for sustainable performance: focused on integrators. Sustainabilit 11 (2019) 1–16.
[15] , and , Socially responsible supply chain with cost learning effects. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 119–142. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI
[16] , and , Corporate social responsibility (CSR) issues in supply chain competition: should greenwashing be regulated? Decis. Sci. 49 (2018) 1088–1115. | DOI
[17] and , Study on coordination mechanism of two-period closed-loop supply chain considering CSR exhibiting. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 28 (2020) 77–86.
[18] and , Equilibrium conditions of a logistics service supply chain with a new smoothing algorithm. Asia. Pac. J. Oper. Res. 35 (2018) 1–22. | MR
[19] and , Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 161 (2015) 181–191. | DOI
[20] , , , and , A time scheduling model of logistics service supply chain with mass customized logistics service. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 16 (2012) 1–18.
[21] , , , and , Order allocation of logistics service supply chain with fairness concern and demand updating: model analysis and empirical examination. Ann. Oper. Res. 268 (2018) 177–213. | MR | DOI
[22] , , , , Production decision and coordination mechanism of socially responsible closed-loop supply chain, Complexity 1 (2020) 1–10. | DOI
[23] and , Research on contract coordination of logistics service supply chain competing by two providers under stochastic demand. Int. Core. J. Eng. 4 (2018) 166–173.
[24] , and , Exploring the antecedents of logistics social responsibility: a focus on Chinese firms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (2012) 18–27. | DOI
[25] , , and , Corporate social responsibility, coordination and profit distribution in a dual-channel supply chain. Pac. Sci. Rev. 16 (2014) 235–249. | DOI
[26] , Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract. Transp. Res. Part. E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 67 (2014) 92–104. | DOI
[27] and , Exploring the effects of social responsibility on coordination and profit division in a supply chain. J. Cleaner. Prod. 139 (2016) 25–40. | DOI
[28] , and , Competitive and cooperative strategies for online shopping logistics service supply chain considering customer expectations and quality cost. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 33 (2019) 136–146.
[29] and , Exploring corporate social responsibility practice versus stakeholder interests in Nordic mining. J. Cleaner. Prod. 197 (2018) 668–677. | DOI
[30] , Supply chain coordination under a revenue-sharing contract with corporate social responsibility and partial demand information. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205 (2018) 1–14. | DOI
[31] and , Driving brand value through CSR initiatives: an empirical study in Indian perspective. Glob. Bus. Rev. 19 (2018) 85–98. | DOI
[32] , and , Pricing decision making in logistics service supply chain considering corporate social responsibility. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 27 (2021) 2461–2475.
[33] and , Double principal-agent mechanism of logistics service supply chain. In: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE). Moscow, Russia (2009).
[34] and , Coordination contracts for supply chain considering supply disruption and loss aversion. J. Railway. Sci. Eng. 17 (2020) 500–508.
[35] , and , Stimulating corporate social responsibility in supply chain in different dominated modes. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 27 (2019) 144–156.
[36] , and , Sales effort and pricing decisions for closed-loop supply chain with corporate social responsibility. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 26 (2020) 839–848.
[37] and , Supply chain coordination decision model of manufacture-led dual-channel supply. Control. Decis. 31 (2016) 1519–1525.
[38] , and , Decision and coordination mechanism in supply chain based on user innovation. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 26 (2020) 1397–1406.
[39] , and , Coordination of a socially responsible two-stage supply chain under random demand. Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res. 16 (2018) 379–400.
[40] , , and , Research on coordination complexity of E-commerce logistics service supply chain. Complexity 1 (2020) 1–21.
[41] , and , Study on quality coordination of logistics service supply chain. Appl. Res. Comput. 29 (2012) 4101–4104.
Cité par Sources :
