Technological innovations play a crucial role in designing an effective green supply chain. However, it is crucial to know the factors influencing technological innovation in a green supply chain. Some preconceptions show that technological innovation in a business can be affected by internal and external factors, and therefore there must be correlations between such factors to flourish the technological innovation and, subsequently, the green supply chain. Besides, predicting the technological innovation level in a supply chain can be vital and direct it to the Industry 5.0 goals. In this research, a 3-phased framework will be proposed to predict the Technological Innovation Level of Green Supply Chains. The scope of this research includes Green Investment, Eco-friendly Design and Customer Collaborations. In the 1st phase of the framework, dependent and independent factors considering the scope of the Research will be determined; and then, using statistical data analysis, the weight of factors, which reflects their impact on technological innovation (dependent factor), will be determined. Then, in the 2nd phase, a comprehensive model will be developed and trained. Using the data of supply chains that were gathered in the first phase, the train and test data would be selected. In continuation, the model will be trained and its performance will be evaluated using some metrics. Then, in the last phase (phase 3), the developed model will be used to predict the technological level of supply chains. The outcomes of this research can help top managers of supply chains to predict the level of technological innovation by investing a certain budget in improving the dependent variables. The outcomes demonstrated that Customer Collaboration (0.481), Eco-friendly design (0.419) and Green Investment (0.41) have significant impacts on technological innovation improvement in the studied cases, respectively. Besides, the results showed the superiority of the K-nearest Neighbor algorithm while using the Minkowski distance method and considering 5 neighbors. The findings indicated that the proposed framework could predict Technological Innovation with 0.751 accuracies. The outcomes of this research can be helpful for industry owners to predict the expected technological innovation level of their system by investing a certain budget in green investment, eco-friendly design and customer collaborations in their enterprises.
Keywords: Green supply chain, technological innovation, design algorithm, green investment, eco-friendly design, customer collaborations
@article{RO_2022__56_4_2775_0,
author = {Beigizadeh, Razieh and Delgoshaei, Aidin and Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar and Hanjani, Sepehr Esmaeili and Ali, Ahad},
title = {A comprehensive model for determining technological innovation level in supply chains using green investment, eco-friendly design and customer collaborations factors},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {2775--2800},
year = {2022},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {56},
number = {4},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2022095},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022095/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Beigizadeh, Razieh AU - Delgoshaei, Aidin AU - Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar AU - Hanjani, Sepehr Esmaeili AU - Ali, Ahad TI - A comprehensive model for determining technological innovation level in supply chains using green investment, eco-friendly design and customer collaborations factors JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2022 SP - 2775 EP - 2800 VL - 56 IS - 4 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022095/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2022095 LA - en ID - RO_2022__56_4_2775_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Beigizadeh, Razieh %A Delgoshaei, Aidin %A Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar %A Hanjani, Sepehr Esmaeili %A Ali, Ahad %T A comprehensive model for determining technological innovation level in supply chains using green investment, eco-friendly design and customer collaborations factors %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2022 %P 2775-2800 %V 56 %N 4 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022095/ %R 10.1051/ro/2022095 %G en %F RO_2022__56_4_2775_0
Beigizadeh, Razieh; Delgoshaei, Aidin; Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar; Hanjani, Sepehr Esmaeili; Ali, Ahad. A comprehensive model for determining technological innovation level in supply chains using green investment, eco-friendly design and customer collaborations factors. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 4, pp. 2775-2800. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022095
[1] , , and , Research on measurement of supply chain finance credit risk based on Internet of Things. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 15 (2019) 1550147719874002. | DOI
[2] and , On a cooperative advertising model for a supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219 (2012) 458–466. | MR | DOI
[3] , , , , and , Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11 (2010) 519–549.
[4] , , and , The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 47 (2011) 822–836. | DOI
[5] and , Adoption of interorganizational system standards in supply chains. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 108 (2008) 529–547. | DOI
[6] and , A hybrid genetic and simulated annealing algorithms for scheduling fashion goods supply chains. Int. J. Adv. Heuristic Meta-heuristic Algorithms 1 (2020) 30–37.
[7] , and , A robust optimization approach for scheduling a supply chain system considering preventive maintenance and emergency services using a hybrid ant colony optimization and simulated annealing algorithm. Uncertain Supply Chain Manage. 7 (2019) 251–274. | DOI
[8] , and , The effects of individual and organizational factors on creativity in sustainable supply chains. Paper presented at the International Conference on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (2020).
[9] , , , , and , A fuzzy logic-based machine-learning algorithm for product distribution in supply chains considering rival’s strategic decisions. Int. J. Ind. Eng. 27 (2020) 933–958.
[10] , and , The effect of educational methods of supply chain management on conflict management ineducational environments. Int. J. Supply Chain Manage. 8 (2019) 18–26.
[11] and , Going green through green supply chain initiatives toward environmental sustainability. Oper. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 2 (2014) 93–110.
[12] , and , Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Policy 60 (2013) 852–865. | DOI
[13] , and , Reducing demand uncertainty in the platelet supply chain through artificial neural networks and ARIMA models. Comput. Biol. Med. 113 (2019) 103415. | DOI
[14] and , Suppliers and environmental innovation. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 20 (2000) 166–186. | DOI
[15] , , and , Barriers to the implementation of environmentally oriented reverse logistics: evidence from the automotive industry sector. Br. J. Manage. 21 (2010) 889–904. | DOI
[16] and , Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities. IIMB Manage. Rev. 23 (2011) 234–245. | DOI
[17] , and , Detecting supply chain innovation potential for sustainable development. J. Bus. Ethics 97 (2010) 425–442. | DOI
[18] and , Drivers and obstacles of product recovery activities in the Greek industry. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 31 (2011) 148–166. | DOI
[19] , , and , A structural equation model of TQM, market orientation and service quality. Manag. Serv. Qual.: Int. J. 22 (2012) 281–309. | DOI
[20] , , and , Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: an empirical analysis. Expert Syst. App. 41 (2014) 6983–6994. | DOI
[21] , , and , A structural analysis of greening the supplier, environmental performance and competitive advantage. Prod. Plan. Control 26 (2015) 116–130. | DOI
[22] and , Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. J. Bus. Ethics 98 (2011) 67–83. | DOI
[23] , , and , Reprint of “Green Supply Chain Collaboration implementation in China: the mediating role of guanxi”. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 74 37–49. | DOI
[24] , , , , , and , Improving innovation performance through environmental practices in the fashion industry: the moderating effect of internationalisation and the influence of collaboration. Prod. Plan. Control 28 (2017) 190–201. | DOI
[25] , , , , and , International e-commerce for fashion products: what is the relationship with performance? Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage. 45 (2017) 1011–1031. | DOI
[26] , and , Customers response to online food delivery services during COVID-19 outbreak using binary logistic regression. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 45 (2021) 396–408. | DOI
[27] and , Green IT adoption: a motivational perspective. Paper presented at the PACIS (2011).
[28] , and , Sustainable entrepreneurship in the transport and retail supply chain sector. J. Risk Finan. Manage. 13 (2020) 267. | DOI
[29] and , Multidimensional structure for the effect of innovation culture and knowledge sharing on the new product development process with emphasis on improving new product development performance. Middle East J. Manage. 6 (2019) 494–512. | DOI
[30] , and , Innovative marketing in SMEs. Eur. J. Marketing 43 (2009) 46–61. | DOI
[31] and , The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 20 (2003) 901–918. | DOI
[32] , , , and , Modeling and solving a five-echelon location–inventory–routing problem for red meat supply chain: case study in Iran. Kybernetes (2020). DOI: . | DOI
[33] , , , , and , Comparative performance analysis of support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression and -nearest neighbours in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) classification using image-based features. Sensors 18 (2018) 1027. | DOI
[34] and , Fundamentals of applied research and sampling techniques. Int. J. Med. Appl. Sci. 2 (2013) 124–132.
[35] and , Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 15 (2004) 394–401. | DOI
[36] , , and , Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res.. 128 (2019). DOI: . | DOI
[37] , and , A multi-phase approach for product hierarchy forecasting in supply chain management: application to MonarchFx Inc. Preprint (2020). | arXiv
[38] and , Shadows and lights of GSCM (Green Supply Chain Management): determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. J. Cleaner Prod. 18 (2010) 953–962. | DOI
[39] , , and , Equilibrium analysis of markup pricing strategies under power imbalance and supply chain competition. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 64 (2017) 464–475. | DOI
[40] and , Application of threshold regression analysis to study the impact of regional technological innovation level on sustainable development. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 89 (2018) 27–32. | DOI
[41] , , and , The influence of management innovation and technological innovation on organization performance. A mediating role of sustainability. Sustainability 11 (2019) 495. | DOI
[42] and , An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. J. Cleaner Prod. 14 (2006) 472–486. | DOI
[43] , and , Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111 (2008) 261–273. | DOI
[44] , and , Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop”. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 44 (2008) 1–18. | DOI
Cité par Sources :
