Based on the advantages of Big Data and blockchain in food traceability area and information sharing area, it has attracted widespread attentions. However, it is not so popular in agricultural field, a vital reason is the scarcity of effective incentives. Government incentive as an important incentive measure is thought to be useful. To study the subsidy rules in the new background, we chose an agri-food supply chain with one producer and one retailer as research object and divided government incentive into direct incentive and indirect incentive. Then, considering the changes of consumer perceived safety on agri-food in the new environment, the demand function was revised. Furthermore, we proposed and analyzed three subsidy models and their benefit functions considering the information service inputs based on Big Data and blockchain (BBIS). Findings: (1) The subsidy models will not change the variation tendency of prices and benefits with the BBIS optimization coefficient, the BBIS investment costs from the producer and the retailer, the ascension of the unreliability coefficient of quality safety and the agri-food quality level. (2) When the subsidy coefficients about direct and indirect subsidies can meet a relationship, benefits of chain members in the indirect subsidy model are higher than them in the direct subsidy model. Findings offer a theoretical guidance for government departments to make and implement the subsidy strategies. In addition, for company, it can provide a theoretical guidance on setting pricing strategies in the new technology background.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2022070
Keywords: Government incentive, Big Data, blockchain, agri-food supply chain
@article{RO_2022__56_3_1995_0,
author = {Liu, Pan and Zhang, Ziran and Dong, Fen-Yi},
title = {Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of {Big} {Data} and blockchain},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {1995--2014},
year = {2022},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {56},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2022070},
mrnumber = {4445944},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022070/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Liu, Pan AU - Zhang, Ziran AU - Dong, Fen-Yi TI - Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of Big Data and blockchain JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2022 SP - 1995 EP - 2014 VL - 56 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022070/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2022070 LA - en ID - RO_2022__56_3_1995_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Liu, Pan %A Zhang, Ziran %A Dong, Fen-Yi %T Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of Big Data and blockchain %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2022 %P 1995-2014 %V 56 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022070/ %R 10.1051/ro/2022070 %G en %F RO_2022__56_3_1995_0
Liu, Pan; Zhang, Ziran; Dong, Fen-Yi. Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of Big Data and blockchain. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 3, pp. 1995-2014. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022070
[1] and , Managing climate risks through social capital in agrifood supply chains. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 25 (2020) 1–16.
[2] APHIS, USDA, Animal disease traceability: summary of program reviews and proposed directions from state-federal working group. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_health/adt-summary-program-review.pdf (2018).
[3] APHIS, USDA, Sheep and goat identification. Available at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/sheep-and-goat-health/scrapie-tags (2020).
[4] , Germany tops 2016 logistics performance index. Web page The World Bank, http://www.worldbank.org (2016).
[5] and , Nano-food packaging: an overview of market, migration research, and safety regulations. J. Food Sci. 80 (2015) R910–R923. | DOI
[6] , and , Blockchain-based traceability in Agri-Food supply chain management: a practical implementation. In: 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture-Tuscany (IOT Tuscany) (2018) 1–44.
[7] , , and , Agricultural pollution and regulation: how to subsidize agriculture? J. Cleaner Prod. 164 (2017) 258–264. | DOI
[8] , and , What are cost changes for produce implementing traceability systems in China? Evidence from enterprise A. Appl. Econ. 51 (2019) 687–697. | DOI
[9] , Two places have detected the new coronavirus in the outer packaging of imported seafood. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1672329966417563915&wfr=spider&for=pc (2020).
[10] and , How might broad adoption of blockchain-based traceability impact the U.S. fresh produce supply chain? Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 44 (2022) 219–236. | DOI
[11] C.B.B. Comunicación, De Alan Turing al “ciberpunk”: la historia de “blockchain”. https://www.bbva.com/es/historia-origen-blockchain-bitcoin/ (2017).
[12] , and , Blockchain for Internet of things: a survey. IEEE Int. Things J. 6 (2019) 8076–8094. | DOI
[13] , , , , , , , and , A survey on blockchain for big data: approaches, opportunities, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 131 (2022) 209–226. | DOI
[14] , , and , Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: a blockchain implementation study. J. Strategic Inf. Syst. 28 (2019) 50–65. | DOI
[15] , and , Game analysis on government subsidy for agricultural enterprise’ IoT investment. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 688 (2019) 55040. | DOI
[16] , and , Future challenges on the use of blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 107 (2018) 222–232. | DOI
[17] , and , Market simulation of traceable food in China based on conjoint-value analysis: a traceable case of pork. Int. Food Agribusiness Manage. Rev. 23 (2020) 735–746. | DOI
[18] , and , Introducing of online channel and management strategy for green agri-food supply chain based on pick-your-own operations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (2019) 1990. | DOI
[19] , and , Dynamic strategy of food supply chain considering greenness and traceable goodwill under technological innovation. Soft Sci. (2020) 1–10.
[20] and , The security and traceability of shared information in the process of transportation of dangerous goods. Paper presented at the IFIP International Conference on New Technologies (2018).
[21] , and , Designing secure lightweight blockchain-enabled RFID-based authentication protocol for supply chains in 5G mobile edge computing environment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 16 (2019) 7081–7093. | DOI
[22] , and , Blockchain-based public auditing for big data in cloud storage. Inf. Process. Manage. 57 (2020) 1–17.
[23] , and , Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: a review for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 219 (2020) 179–194. | DOI
[24] and , Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Accounting Finance Manage. 25 (2018) 18–27.
[25] and , Research on decision-making model of high-quality fresh agricultural products dual-channel supply chain considering the application of traceability system. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 28 (2019) 98–109.
[26] , Investment decision and coordination of green agri-food supply chain considering information service based on blockchain and big data. J. Cleaner Prod. 277 (2020) 123646. | DOI
[27] and , Logistics outsourcing of fresh enterprises considering fresh-keeping efforts based on evolutionary game analysis. IEEE Access 9 (2021) 25659–25670. | DOI
[28] and , A study on supply chain investment decision-making and coordination in the Big Data environment. Ann. Oper. Res. 270 (2018) 235–253. | MR | DOI
[29] and , Investment decision-making and coordination of a three-stage supply chain considering data company in the big data era. Ann. Oper. Res. 78 (2018) 1–17. | MR
[30] , and , What drives China’s new agricultural subsidies? World Dev. 93 (2017) 279–292. | DOI
[31] , Logistics & Supply Chain Management: Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow, England (1992).
[32] , , , and , Big data: the management revolution. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90 (2012) 60–68.
[33] , and , An overview of smart contract and use cases in blockchain technology. Paper presented at the 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (2018).
[34] and , Security and privacy for big data: a systematic literature review. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2017).
[35] , , and , Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: a state of the art survey. J. Network Comput. App. 166 (2020) 102693. | DOI
[36] , , and , Integration of blockchain and cloud of things: architecture, applications and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 22 (2020) 2521–2549. | DOI
[37] and , The components of a food traceability system. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 77 (2018) 143–149. | DOI
[38] , and , Breaking Blockchain Open: Deloitte’s 2018 Global Blockchain Survey. Accessed 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cz/Documents/financial-services/cz-2018-deloitte-globalblockchain-survey.pdf:Deloitte (2018).
[39] and , Optimal strategies for a three-level contract-farming supply chain with subsidy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 216 (2019) 1–36. | DOI
[40] , , and , Management strategies and collaborative relationships for sustainability in the agrifood supply chain. Sustainability 13 (2021) 749. | DOI
[41] , Convergence of AI, IoT, big data and blockchain: a review. Lake Inst. J. 1 (2018) 1–18.
[42] , and , Predicting resilience in retailing using grey theory and moving probability based Markov models. J. Retail. Consumer Serv. 62 (2021) 102599. | DOI
[43] , and , Big Data and Blockchain Basis for Operating a New Archetype of Supply Chain. Springer, Cham (2018).
[44] and , A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation. Inf. Process. Manage. 54 (2018) 758–790. | DOI
[45] and , IoT security: review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 82 (2018) 395–411. | DOI
[46] and , Modeling the reforms of the common agricultural policy for Arable crops under uncertainty. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publ. 88 (2010) 43–56.
[47] Sohu, New coronavirus has been detected in the outer packaging of frozen seafood 20201217. https://www.sohu.com/a/413025856_100000405 (2020).
[48] , , and , Exploring the impact of blockchain on the performance of agri-food supply chains. Food Control 119 (2021) 107495. | DOI
[49] , and , Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: an action research using case study approach. Omega 102 (2021) 102452. | DOI
[50] , , , and , Bridging the gaps in traceability systems for fresh produce supply chains: overview and development of an integrated IoT-based system. Appl. Sci. 11 (2021) 7596. | DOI
[51] , The world’s first blockchain farm-rice bags for good food, 2020/05/16. http://www.agrichains.cn/ (2020).
[52] , and , Agriculture supply chain optimization based on supply and demand uncertainty with government subsidy policies. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Chin. 47 (2017) 267–273. | Zbl
[53] , An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. Paper presented at the 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM). IEEE (2016). | DOI
[54] , and , The incentive and supervision mechanism of banks on third-party B2B platforms in online supply chain finance using big data. Mobile Inf. Syst. 2021 (2021) 1–16. | DOI
[55] , Emerging Opportunities for the Application of Blockchain in the Agri-food Industry: : FAO and ICTSD: Rome and Geneva. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3 (2018).
[56] , and , Privacy preservation in blockchain based IoT systems: integration issues, prospects, challenges, and future research directions. Comput. Syst. 97 (2019) 512–529.
[57] , , , and , Integration of federated machine learning and blockchain for the provision of secure big data analytics for internet of things. Comput. Secur. 109 (2021) 102393. | DOI
[58] , and , System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability. Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 63 (2020) 101896. | DOI
[59] , Design of agricultural product quality and safety big data fusion model based on blockchain technology. Paper presented at the International Conference on Advanced Hybrid Information Processing (2019).
[60] , and , Factor reallocation and structural transformation implications of grain subsidies in China. J. Asian Econ. 71 (2020) 101248. | DOI
[61] , and , An analysis of strategies for adopting blockchain technology in the fresh product supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2021) 1–18. DOI: . | DOI
[62] , and , Blockchain + Big Data: Break Through the Bottleneck and Open a New Era of Intelligence. China Machine Press, Beijing (2019).
[63] , , , and , Subsidize farmers or bioenergy producer? The design of a government subsidy program for a bioenergy supply chain. Nav. Res. Logistics 68 (2021) 1082–1097. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[64] , , , and , Authentication and traceability of food products through the supply chain using NQR spectroscopy. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) (2017). | DOI
[65] , and , Blockchain-based life cycle assessment: an implementation framework and system architecture. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 152 (2020) 104512. | DOI
[66] , and , Impact of government subsidy on agricultural production and pollution: a game-theoretic approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 285 (2021) 124806. | DOI
[67] , , and , Effects of agricultural subsidy policies on comparative advantage and production protection in China. Chin. Econ. 46 (2013) 20–37. | DOI
[68] , , , and , An overview of blockchain technology: architecture, consensus, and future trends. Paper presented at the 6th IEEE International Congress on Big Data (2017).
Cité par Sources :
