no. 2
Resource allocation for supply chains based on Pareto-optimal two-stage cross-efficiency model
RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 2, pp. 891-910

The contradiction between the scarcity of common resources and the infinity of human demand for these resources has a significant impact on social development. Therefore, resource allocation can make the best use of limited resources in economic activities. Taking the two-stage supply chain where the outputs from the upstream supplier are taken as the inputs for the downstream manufacturer as an example, this paper applies the cross-efficiency model to comprehensively evaluate the efficiency scores of supply chains in the process of resource allocation and explores the relationship between the cross-efficiency of the supply chain and that of two enterprises within this supply chain. Furthermore, the self-interested behavior of enterprises is taken as the Pareto improvement principle to propose a Pareto-optimal two-stage cross-efficiency model, and this model can be used to optimally allocate the limited resources among two-stage supply chains. A common set of weights is determined to make all supply chains DEA efficient. Finally, the proposed model is illustrated to be feasible and effective through a practical application of 27 Iranian resin production companies.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2022029
Classification : 90B30
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis, two-stage cross-efficiency model, Pareto optimality, resource allocation 
@article{RO_2022__56_2_891_0,
     author = {Zhao, Yuanyuan and Fang, Lei},
     title = {Resource allocation for supply chains based on {Pareto-optimal} two-stage cross-efficiency model},
     journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
     pages = {891--910},
     year = {2022},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {56},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2022029},
     mrnumber = {4407597},
     zbl = {1487.90063},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022029/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zhao, Yuanyuan
AU  - Fang, Lei
TI  - Resource allocation for supply chains based on Pareto-optimal two-stage cross-efficiency model
JO  - RAIRO. Operations Research
PY  - 2022
SP  - 891
EP  - 910
VL  - 56
IS  - 2
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022029/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2022029
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2022__56_2_891_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Zhao, Yuanyuan
%A Fang, Lei
%T Resource allocation for supply chains based on Pareto-optimal two-stage cross-efficiency model
%J RAIRO. Operations Research
%D 2022
%P 891-910
%V 56
%N 2
%I EDP-Sciences
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2022029/
%R 10.1051/ro/2022029
%G en
%F RO_2022__56_2_891_0
Zhao, Yuanyuan; Fang, Lei. Resource allocation for supply chains based on Pareto-optimal two-stage cross-efficiency model. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 2, pp. 891-910. doi: 10.1051/ro/2022029

[1] Q. An, P. Wang, A. Emrouznejad and J. Hu, Fixed cost allocation based on the principle of efficiency invariance in two-stage systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 283 (2020) 662–675. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[2] A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, Programming with linear fractional functionals. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 9 (1962) 181–186. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[3] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[4] Y. Chen, W. D. Cook, N. Li and J. Zhu, Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2009) 1170–1176. | Zbl | DOI

[5] L. Chen, Y. Huang, M. J. Li and Y. M. Wang, Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 280 (2020) 219–229. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[6] M. Chen, S. Ang, L. Jiang and F. Yang, Centralized resource allocation based on cross-evaluation considering organizational objective and individual preferences. OR Spectr. 42 (2020) 529–565. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[7] W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65 (2014) 265–268. | DOI

[8] M. Davtalab-Olyaie and M. Asgharian, On Pareto-optimality in the cross-efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 288 (2021) 247–257. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[9] J. Doyle and R. Green, Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994) 567–578. | Zbl | DOI

[10] J. Du, W. D. Cook, L. Liang and J. Zhu, Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235 (2014) 206–214. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[11] C. Kao and S. T. Liu, Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems. Omega 83 (2019) 70–79. | DOI

[12] M. Khodakarami, A. Shabani, R. F. Saen and M. Azadi, Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement 70 (2015) 62–74. | DOI

[13] F. Li, Q. Zhu and L. Liang, Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach. Expert. Syst. Appl. 96 (2018) 196–207. | DOI

[14] F. Li, Y. Wang, A. Emrouznejad, Q. Zhu and G. Kou, Allocating a fixed cost across decision-making units with undesirable outputs: A bargaining game approach. To appear in: J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2021). DOI: . | DOI

[15] L. Liang, W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav. Res. Logist. (NRL) 55 (2008) 643–653. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[16] L. Liang, J. Wu, W. D. Cook and J. Zhu, The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Oper. Res. 56 (2008) 1278–1288. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[17] S. Lim, Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 (2012) 726–731. | DOI

[18] C. Q. Ma, D. B. Liu, Z. B. Zhou, W. Zhao and W. B. Liu, Game cross efficiency for systems with two-stage structures. J. Appl. Math. 747596 (2014) 747596. | MR | Zbl

[19] F. Y. Meng and B. B. Xiong, Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 294 (2021) 622–632. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[20] H. H. Örkcü, V. S. Özsoy, M. Örkcü and H. Bal, A neutral cross efficiency approach for basic two stage production systems. Expert. Syst. Appl. 125 (2019) 333–344. | DOI

[21] S. J. Sharahi and K. Khalili-Damghani, Fuzzy type-II De-Novo programming for resource allocation and target setting in network data envelopment analysis: A natural gas supply chain. Expert. Syst. Appl. 117 (2019) 312–329. | DOI

[22] T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman and A. J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Dir. Progr. Eval. 1986 (1986) 73–105.

[23] X. Shao and M. Q. Wang, Two-stage cross-efficiency evaluation based on prospect theory. To appear in: J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2021). DOI: . | DOI

[24] H. Sharafi, F. H. Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo and S. Razipour-Ghalehjough, Fair allocation fixed cost using cross-efficiency based on Pareto concept. Asia. Pac. J. Oper. Res. 37 (2020) 1950036. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[25] Y. M. Wang and K. S. Chin, A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert. Syst. Appl. 37 (2010) 3666–3675. | DOI

[26] Y. M. Wang, K. S. Chin and P. Jiang, Weight determination in the cross-efficiency evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 61 (2011) 497–502. | DOI

[27] J. Wu, W. Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. N. Liu and X. H. Meng, A matrix-based Bayesian approach for manufacturing resource allocation planning in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 (2013) 1451–1463. | DOI

[28] J. Wu, J. F. Chu, J. S. Sun and Q. Y. Zhu, DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2016) 571–579. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[29] J. Wu, J. F. Chu, J. S. Sun, Q. Y. Zhu and L. Liang, Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 (2016) 143–151. | DOI

[30] Q. W. Xie, R. Li, Y. P. Zou, Y. J. Liu and X. J. Wang, A two-stage method for improving discrimination and variable selection in DEA models. . To appear in: IMA J. Manag. Math. (2021) dpab023. DOI: . | DOI | MR | Zbl

[31] M. M. Yu, L. H. Chen and B. Hsiao, A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016) 1817–1822. | DOI

[32] J. Y. Zhao, X. Xi, S. S. Wang and C. Y. Gong, Dynamic analysis of different resource allocations: Implications for resource orchestration management of strategic alliances. Comput. Ind. Eng. 158 (2021) 107393. | DOI

[33] Q. Y. Zhu, J. Wu, X. C. Li and B. B. Xiong, China’s regional natural resource allocation and utilization: A DEA-based approach in a big data environment. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017) 809–818. | DOI

Cité par Sources :