Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer’s fairness concern
RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 1, pp. 23-47

Online retailing provides alternative shopping channels, where the retail platform can either let manufacturers directly sell to consumers or open a self-operated channel, or even both. Regardless of sales channels, consumers often pay attention to the income gap between themselves and enterprises (named consumer’s fairness concern). In this work, we explore how consumers’ fairness concerns affect the optimal decisions of both manufacturer and retail platform under different retail channel modes (single-channel mode and mixed-channel mode). The results show that consumer’s fairness concern has a negative impact on the retail price under low production cost in single-channel mode, while the retail prices in mix-channel mode are jointly determined by consumer’s fairness concern and revenue sharing ratio. Besides, if the market channel mode has not yet formed, the retail platform can choose either a self-operated channel or manufacturer consignment channel, depending on the consumer’s fairness concern level and revenue sharing ratio. By contrast, if the market channel mode has already been formed, the retail platform should make effort to reduce consumer’s fairness concern if only the self-operated channel exists, while maintain consumer’s fairness concern and revenue sharing ratio at a moderate level if there exist mixed channels.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2021171
Classification : 91A40, 91B50
Keywords: Consumer’s fairness concern, single-channel-mode, mixed-channels-mode, Stackelberg game
@article{RO_2022__56_1_23_0,
     author = {Huang, Mengli and Zhang, Yulin and Fan, Haowen},
     title = {Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer{\textquoteright}s fairness concern},
     journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
     pages = {23--47},
     year = {2022},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {56},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2021171},
     mrnumber = {4376280},
     zbl = {1483.91094},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021171/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Huang, Mengli
AU  - Zhang, Yulin
AU  - Fan, Haowen
TI  - Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer’s fairness concern
JO  - RAIRO. Operations Research
PY  - 2022
SP  - 23
EP  - 47
VL  - 56
IS  - 1
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021171/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2021171
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2022__56_1_23_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Huang, Mengli
%A Zhang, Yulin
%A Fan, Haowen
%T Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer’s fairness concern
%J RAIRO. Operations Research
%D 2022
%P 23-47
%V 56
%N 1
%I EDP-Sciences
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021171/
%R 10.1051/ro/2021171
%G en
%F RO_2022__56_1_23_0
Huang, Mengli; Zhang, Yulin; Fan, Haowen. Research on retail channel decisions considering consumer’s fairness concern. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 56 (2022) no. 1, pp. 23-47. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021171

M. C. Campbell, Perceptions of price unfairness: antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. Res. 36 (1999) 187–199 | DOI

Y. C. Chen, S. C. Fang and U. P. Wen, Pricing policies for substitutable products in a supply chain with internet and traditional channels. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 224 (2013) 542–551 | MR | Zbl | DOI

D. Corsten and N. Kumar, Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. J. Mark. 69 (2005) 80–94 | DOI

T. H. Cui, J. S. Raju and Z. J. Zhang, Fairness and channel coordination. Manage. Sci. 53 (2007) 1303–1314 | DOI

A. Dumrongsiri, M. Fan and A. Jain, A supply chain model with direct and retail channels. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187 (2008) 691–718 | MR | Zbl | DOI

G. Ferrer and J. M. Swaminathan, Managing new and remanufactured products. Manage. Sci. 52 (2006) 15–26 | DOI

L. Guo, Inequity aversion and fairness selling. J. Mark. Res. 52 (2015) 77–89 | DOI

X. Guo and B. Jiang, Signaling through price and quality to consumers with fairness concerns. J. Mark. Res. 53 (2016) 988–1000 | DOI

A. Hagiu and J. Wright, Marketplace or reseller? Manage. Sci. 61 (2014) 184–203 | DOI

T. Hendershott and J. Zhang, A model of direct and intermediated sales. J. Econ. Manage. Strat. 15 (2006) 279–316 | DOI

T. H. Ho and J. Zhang, Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Manage. Sci. 54 (2008) 686–700 | Zbl | DOI

D. A. Kahneman, J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler, Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59 (1986) 285–300 | DOI

H. Ke and J. Liu, Dual-channel supply chain competition with channel preference and sales effort under uncertain environment. J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comp. 8 (2017) 781–795 | DOI

H. Kurata, D. Q. Yao and J. J. Liu, Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180 (2007) 262–281 | Zbl | DOI

Q. H. Li and B. Li, Dual-channel supply chain equilibrium problems regarding retail services and fairness concerns. Appl. Math. Model. 40 (2016) 7349–7367 | MR | Zbl | DOI

J. J. Liu and H. Ke, Firms’ pricing strategies under different decision sequences in dual-format online retailing. Soft. Comput. 24 (2020) 7811–7826 | Zbl | DOI

X. Q. Liu, Y. W. Zhou, Y. Shen, C. M. Ge and J. H. Jiang, Zooming in the impacts of merchants’ participation in transformation from online flash sale to mixed sale e-commerce platform. Inf. Manage. 58 (2021) 1–18

C. H. Loch and Y. Z. Wu, Social preferences and supply chain performance: an experimental study. Manage. Sci. 54 (2008) 1835–1849 | Zbl | DOI

B. Mantin, H. Krishnan and T. Dhar, The strategic role of third-party marketplaces in retailing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 (2014) 1937–1949 | DOI

S. Maxwell, Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase. J. Econ. Psychol. 23 (2002) 191–212 | DOI

H. Oosterbeek, R. Sloof and G. V. D. Kuilen, Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Exp. Econ. 7 (2004) 171–188 | Zbl | DOI

J. K. Ryan, D. Sun and X. Y. Zhao, Competition and coordination in online marketplaces. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (2012) 997–1014 | DOI

Y. L. Shen, Platform retailing with slotting allowance and revenue sharing. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69 (2018) 1033–1045 | DOI

H. Stephen and I. Robert, Slotting allowances and retail product variety under oligopoly. Econ. Lett. 158 (2017) 34–36 | MR | Zbl | DOI

L. Tian, A. J. Vakharia and Y. L. Tan, Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: strategic analysis of an emerging E-commerce model. Prod. Oper. Manag. 27 (2018) 1595–1610 | DOI

W. Wang, G. Li and T. C. E. Cheng, Channel selection in a supply chain with a multi-channel retailer: the role of channel operating costs. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 173 (2016) 54–65 | DOI

Y. Wen, Y. Wang and B. Dan, Research on multi-channel competition strategy considering introduction of self-operated channel by e-commerce platform and online direct channel by manufacturer. Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 27 (2019) 77–89

D. Q. Yao and J. J. Liu, Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels. Omega-Int. J. Manage. S. 33 (2005) 235–247 | DOI

Z. Yi, Y. L. Wang and Y. Liu, The impact of consumer fairness seeking on distribution channel selection: direct selling vs. agent selling. Prod. Oper. Manag. 27 (2018) 1148–1167 | DOI

R. Yoshihara and N. Matsubayashi, Channel coordination between manufacturers and competing retailers with fairness concerns. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 290 (2021) 546–555 | MR | Zbl | DOI

J. Zhao, L. Liu and Y. Wang, Research on competition and mode selection of suppliers based on e-commerce platform. Syst. Eng. Theor. Prac. 39 (2019) 2058–2069

Cité par Sources :