Hesitant Fuzzy Set (HFS) permits the membership function having a collection of probable values which are more effective for modelling the real-life problems. Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) process apparently assesses multiple conflicting attribute in decision making. In traditional decision making problems, each player is moving independently whereas in reality it is seen that each player aims to maximize personal profit which causes a negative impact on other player. MADM problem treats with candidate to the best alternative corresponding to the several attributes. Here, we present an MADM problem under hesitant fuzzy information and then transforming it into two-person matrix game, referred to herein as MADM game. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is one of the prominent approach for solving the MADM problems. In this work, we develop the TOPSIS based on Ordered Weighted Aggregation (OWA) operator and hybrid hesitant fuzzy normalized Euclidean distance.Please check whether short title on odd pages have been set correctly. Then the two approaches, namely Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Ordered Weighted Aggregation-TOPSIS (HHFOWA-TOPSIS) and the Linear Programming Problem (LPP) are applied to solve the formulated MADM game. For solving MADM game, we apply LPP by considering the various values of α,ψ, and HHFOWA-TOPSIS for finding the optimal alternative according to their scores.Please provide missing AMS classification codes. An investment selection problem is included to explain the feasibility and superiority of our formulated approaches. A comparison analysis is drawn among the obtained results which are derived from the two approaches. LPP and HHFOWA-TOPSIS provide the best alternative for the proposed problem. Finally, conclusions about our findings and outlooks are described.
Keywords: Matrix games, multiple attribute decision making, hesitant fuzzy set, aggregation operator, HHFOWA-TOPSIS
@article{RO_2021__55_5_3087_0,
author = {Jana, Jishu and Roy, Sankar Kumar},
title = {Two-person game with hesitant fuzzy payoff: {An} application in {MADM}},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {3087--3105},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {5},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2021149},
mrnumber = {4324003},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021149/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Jana, Jishu AU - Roy, Sankar Kumar TI - Two-person game with hesitant fuzzy payoff: An application in MADM JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 3087 EP - 3105 VL - 55 IS - 5 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021149/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2021149 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_5_3087_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Jana, Jishu %A Roy, Sankar Kumar %T Two-person game with hesitant fuzzy payoff: An application in MADM %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 3087-3105 %V 55 %N 5 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021149/ %R 10.1051/ro/2021149 %G en %F RO_2021__55_5_3087_0
Jana, Jishu; Roy, Sankar Kumar. Two-person game with hesitant fuzzy payoff: An application in MADM. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 5, pp. 3087-3105. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021149
[1] , , and , Z-equilibria in bi-matrix games with uncertain payoffs. RAIRO Oper. Res. 54 (2020) 393–412. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI
[2] , Hesitant information sets and application in group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 75 (2019) 120–129. | DOI
[3] and , Solving multi-objective fuzzy matrix games via multi-objective linear programming approach. Kybernetika 52 (2016) 153–168. | MR
[4] , and , Duality in linear programming with fuzzy parameters and matrix games with fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 46 (2004) 253–269. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[5] and , Intuitionistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy matrix games with a new aggregation operator for solving management problem. Granul. Comput. 6 (2021) 359–375. | DOI
[6] , and , Analysis of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy matrix games using robust ranking. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33 (2017) 327–336. | DOI
[7] , and , Hesitant interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-linguistic term set approach in Prisoners’ dilemma game theory using TOPSIS: a case study on Human-trafficking. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2020) 797–816. | MR | DOI
[8] and , An approach to solve multi-objective linear production planning games with fuzzy parameters. Yugosl. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2018) 237–248. | MR | DOI
[9] , Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 32 (1989) 275–289. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[10] and , Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York (1992). | Zbl | MR | DOI
[11] and , Two-person zero-sum game approach for fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157 (2006) 34–51. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[12] , Modelling cooperative advertising decisions in a manufacturer-distributor-retailer supply chain using game theory. Yugosl. J. Oper. Res. 30 (2020) 147–176. | MR | DOI
[13] and , A novel distance-based multiple attribute decision-making with hesitant fuzzy sets. Soft Comput. 24 (2020) 5005–5017. | DOI
[14] and , An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Appl. Soft Comput. 52 (2017) 1084–1097. | DOI
[15] and , Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York (1981). | Zbl | MR | DOI
[16] and , Solution of matrix games with generalized trapezoidal fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 10 (2018) 213–224. | DOI
[17] and , Dual hesitant fuzzy matrix games: based on new similarity measure. Soft Comput. 23 (2019) 8873–8886. | DOI
[18] and , Soft matrix game: A hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach. Am. J. Math. Manag. Sci. 40 (2021) 107–119.
[19] , and , Ordered weighted averaging aggregation on convex poset. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 27 (2019) 612–617. | DOI
[20] and , Designing a hybrid reinforcement learning based algorithm with application in prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec. Ann. Oper. Res. (2021) 1–45. DOI: . | DOI | MR
[21] and , Robust modelling and prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2021) 1–17. DOI: . | DOI
[22] and , Designing emergency flood evacuation plans using robust optimization and artificial intelligence. J. Comb. Optim. 41 (2021) 640–677. | MR | DOI
[23] , , and , Gradient-based grey wolf optimizer with Gaussian walk: Application in modelling and prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic. Expert Syst. Appl. 177 (2021). DOI: . | DOI
[24] and , Knowledge measure of hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-attribute decision-making. Comput. Appl. Math. 39 (2020) 1–31. | MR | DOI
[25] , Solving bimatrix games with fuzzy payoffs by introducing nature as a third player. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 657–666. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[26] , Non cooperative fuzzy games in normal form: A survey. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 3184–3210. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[27] and , The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 60 (2017) 167–179. | DOI
[28] and , Some new hybrid weighted aggregation operators under hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 26 (2014) 1601–1617. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[29] , , and , Determination of start times and ordering plans for two-period projects with interdependent demand in project-oriented organizations: A case study on molding industry. J. Proj. Manag. 2 (2017) 119–142.
[30] , , , , and , A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 13 (2020) 1–22. | MR
[31] , and , Robust bi-level programming for renewable energy location. Int. J. Energy Res. 45 (2021) 7521–7534. | DOI
[32] , , , , and , Resilience and sustainable supply chain network design by considering renewable energy. Int. J. Energy Res. (2021). DOI: . | DOI
[33] , A unified model between the weighted average and induced OWA operator. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011) 11560–11572. | DOI
[34] , and , Feature-based hesitant fuzzy aggregation method for satisfaction with life scale. Appl. Soft Comput. 94 (2020). DOI: . | DOI
[35] , and , Birough programming approach for solving bi-matrix games with birough payoff elements. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29 (2015) 863–875. | MR | DOI
[36] and , Fuzzy and multiobjective games for conflict resolution. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2001). | Zbl | MR | DOI
[37] and , Some topics in two-person games. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York (1971). | Zbl | MR
[38] , Game theory under MCDM and fuzzy set theory, VDM. VDM (Verlag Dr. Muller), Germany (2010).
[39] and , Bimatrix game in bifuzzy rough environment. J. Uncertainty Anal. Appl. 1 (2013) 11. | DOI
[40] and , Rough set approach to bimatrix game. Int. J. Oper. Res. 23 (2015) 229–244. | MR | DOI
[41] and , An approach to solve fuzzy interval valued matrix game. Int. J. Oper. Res. 26 (2016) 253–267. | MR
[42] and , Solving matrix game with rough payoffs using genetic algorithm. Oper. Res. Int. J. 16 (2016) 117–130. | DOI
[43] and , Intelligent water management: a triangular type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy matrix games approach. Water Resour. Manag. 32 (2018) 949–968. | DOI
[44] and , The multi-objective linear production planning games in triangular hesitant fuzzy sets. Sadhana 46 (2021) 176. | MR | DOI
[45] and , Interactive decision making for multiobjective non linear programming problems with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 29 (1989) 315–326. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[46] and , Max-min solution for fuzzy multiobjective matrix games. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 67 (1994) 53–69. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[47] and , On generalized correlation coefficients of the hesitant fuzzy sets with their application to clustering analysis. Comput. Appl. Math. 38 (2019) 1–26. | MR | DOI
[48] , , and , An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications. Appl. Soft Comput. 68 (2018) 249–267. | DOI
[49] and , On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Jeju Island, Korea (2009) 1378–1382.
[50] and , Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf. Sci. 397 (2017) 155–167. | DOI
[51] and , Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52 (2011) 395–407. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[52] , and , A novel MAGDM approach with proportional hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 11 (2018) 256–271. | DOI
[53] , On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 18 (1988) 183–190. | Zbl | MR | DOI
[54] and , The behavioral TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 89 (2017) 266–272. | DOI
[55] , Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8 (1965) 338–356. | Zbl | MR | DOI
Cité par Sources :
