Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a useful mathematical tool for evaluating the performance of production units and ranking their relative efficiency. In many real-world applications, production units belong to several separate groups and also consist of several sub-units. In this paper, we introduce a new method of evaluating group efficiency of two-stage production systems. To this end, some new DEA models are introduced for evaluating and ranking groups of production systems based on the average and weakest group performance criteria. Some numerical examples, including an empirical application in the banking industry, are also provided for illustration.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis (DEA), group ranking, network group efficiency (NGE), Network DEA (NDEA)
@article{RO_2021__55_3_1825_0,
author = {Shahbazifar, Mohammad Sajjad and Kazemi Matin, Reza and Khounsiavash, Mohsen and Koushki, Fereshteh},
title = {Group ranking of two-stage production units in network data envelopment analysis},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {1825--1840},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2021082},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021082/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Shahbazifar, Mohammad Sajjad AU - Kazemi Matin, Reza AU - Khounsiavash, Mohsen AU - Koushki, Fereshteh TI - Group ranking of two-stage production units in network data envelopment analysis JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 1825 EP - 1840 VL - 55 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021082/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2021082 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_3_1825_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Shahbazifar, Mohammad Sajjad %A Kazemi Matin, Reza %A Khounsiavash, Mohsen %A Koushki, Fereshteh %T Group ranking of two-stage production units in network data envelopment analysis %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 1825-1840 %V 55 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021082/ %R 10.1051/ro/2021082 %G en %F RO_2021__55_3_1825_0
Shahbazifar, Mohammad Sajjad; Kazemi Matin, Reza; Khounsiavash, Mohsen; Koushki, Fereshteh. Group ranking of two-stage production units in network data envelopment analysis. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 3, pp. 1825-1840. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021082
[1] , and , Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 140 (2002) 249–265. | Zbl | DOI
[2] and , Review of efficiency ranking methods in data envelopment analysis., Measurement 106 (2017) 161–172. | DOI
[3] and , A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 39 (1993) 1261–1264. | Zbl | DOI
[4] , and , Group cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis: An application to taiwan hotels. Comput. Ind. Eng. 125 (2018) 190–199. | DOI
[5] , and , Cross-ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 37 (2013) 398–405. | DOI
[6] and , Ranking two-stage production units in data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 33 (2016) 1650002. | DOI
[7] and , The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175 (2006) 1311–1320. | Zbl | DOI
[8] , and , Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978) 429–444. | Zbl | DOI
[9] , , , , , and , Two phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: Tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising. Center for Cybernetic Studies. University of Texas-Austin Austin, Texas, USA (1986).
[10] , Ranking efficient units in DEA. Omega 32 (2004) 213–219. | DOI
[11] , , and , Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2009) 1170–1176. | Zbl | DOI
[12] and , Within-group common weights in DEA: An analysis of power plant efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178 (2007) 207–216. | Zbl | DOI
[13] , and , Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 38 (2010) 423–430. | DOI
[14] , and , A network DEA approach for series multi-stage processes. Omega 61 (2016) 35–48. | DOI
[15] and , Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994) 567–578. | Zbl | DOI
[16] and , Multi-period efficiency measurement of network production systems. Measurement 134 (2019) 835–844. | DOI
[17] , , and , Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257 (2017) 896–906. | DOI
[18] , , and , A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181 (2007) 331–337. | Zbl | DOI
[19] , Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009) 949–962. | Zbl | DOI
[20] and , Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in taiwan. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185 (2008) 418–429. | Zbl | DOI
[21] , and , Marginal rates of substitution in the presence of non-discretionary factors: A data envelopment analysis approach. Measurement 58 (2014) 409–415. | DOI
[22] , and , Marginal rates of substitution in data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs: A directional approach. Measurement 68 (2015) 49–57. | DOI
[23] , Performance measurement and productivity management in production units with network structure by identification of the most productive scale size pattern. Int. J. Supp. Oper. Manage. 5 (2018) 379–395.
[24] and , Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Comput. Oper. Res. 31 (2004) 1365–1410. | Zbl | DOI
[25] , and , Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273 (2019) 364–375. | DOI
[26] , and , A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Comput. Optim. Appl. 14 (1999) 261–266. | Zbl | DOI
[27] and , A model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Ricerca Operativa (2001).
[28] and , Network DEA. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 34 (2000) 35–49. | DOI
[29] and , Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Oper. Res. 40 (1992) 1053–1061. | Zbl | DOI
[30] , , On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. J. Multi-Crit. Dec. Anal. 6 (1997) 309–319. | Zbl | DOI
[31] and , Ranking intervals and dominance relations for ratio-based efficiency analysis. Manage. Sci. 57 (2011) 200–214. | Zbl | DOI
[32] , and , Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Direct. Program Eval. 1986 (1986) 73–105. | DOI
[33] , and , Dominance at the divisional efficiencies level in network DEA: The case of two-stage processes. Omega 85 (2019) 144–155. | DOI
[34] , , and , A two-stage data envelopment analysis model for measuring performance in three-level supply chains. Measurement 78 (2016) 322–333. | DOI
[35] and , Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009) 243–252. | Zbl | DOI
[36] , and , Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J. Product. Anal. 7 (1996) 379–398. | DOI
[37] , Derivation of the maximin efficiency ratio model from the maximum decisional efficiency principle. Ann. Oper. Res. 73 (1997) 323–338. | Zbl | DOI
[38] , , , and , Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 (2016) 143–151. | DOI
[39] , , , and , Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67 (2016) 1446–1458. | DOI
[40] , Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and Dea Excel Solver, Vol 51. Springer Science & Business Media (2003). | Zbl | DOI
Cité par Sources :
