Multi-criteria decision methods are very popular in decision-making for many application fields thanks to their versatility and ability to involve qualitative and quantitative data in the analysis. On the other hand, the many of these techniques requires time consuming analysis and the involvement of expert users in the decision-making process. In this paper, a novel method named Card Game Analysis (CGA) is proposed to perform Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) analysis. Such methodology uses a set of cards and a suitable game procedure to perform the analysis, allowing to determine indirectly tabulated weights of involved parameters (criteria, sub-criteria, alternatives, etc.) and obtain the ranking of priorities. The CGA is defined following the footsteps of the ``structuring of the problem’’, typical of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and takes inspiration from an evaluation procedure presented in the related literature. In particular, the CGA is composed by the following steps: (1) structuring of the problem, (2) card setting, (3) card game weights evaluation, (4) synthesis of priorities. Finally, a validation through a comparison with the AHP procedure is performed by exploiting 25 case studies regarding the desirability of the enabling technologies of the Industry 4.0 for a set of companies in the Adriatic Ionian area.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
Keywords: Decision science, multi-criteria decision methods, card game analysis
@article{RO_2021__55_3_1213_0,
author = {Sangiorgio, Valentino and Di Pierro, Beatrice and Roccotelli, Michele and Silvestri, Bartolomeo},
title = {Card game analysis for fast multi-criteria decision making},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {1213--1229},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
number = {3},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2021059},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021059/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Sangiorgio, Valentino AU - Di Pierro, Beatrice AU - Roccotelli, Michele AU - Silvestri, Bartolomeo TI - Card game analysis for fast multi-criteria decision making JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - 1213 EP - 1229 VL - 55 IS - 3 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021059/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2021059 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_3_1213_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Sangiorgio, Valentino %A Di Pierro, Beatrice %A Roccotelli, Michele %A Silvestri, Bartolomeo %T Card game analysis for fast multi-criteria decision making %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P 1213-1229 %V 55 %N 3 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021059/ %R 10.1051/ro/2021059 %G en %F RO_2021__55_3_1213_0
Sangiorgio, Valentino; Di Pierro, Beatrice; Roccotelli, Michele; Silvestri, Bartolomeo. Card game analysis for fast multi-criteria decision making. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 3, pp. 1213-1229. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021059
[1] , , and , Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 89 (2018) 369–384. | MR | DOI
[2] and , Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 14 (2006) 445–459. | Zbl | DOI
[3] and , MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: Verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 47 (2013) 5–20.
[4] , and , An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (2007) 3738–3756. | Zbl | DOI
[5] , and , Comparing AHP and CBA as decision methods to resolve the choosing problem in detailed design. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (2014) 04014063. | DOI
[6] and , Group multi-criteria decision making based upon interval-valued fuzzy numbers: an extension of the MULTIMOORA method. Expert Syst. App. 40 (2013) 543–550. | DOI
[7] , , and , PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 200 (2010) 198–215. | Zbl | DOI
[8] , , and , A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst. App. 39 (2012) 13051–13069. | DOI
[9] and , A generalized structural dominance method for the analysis of large-scale systems. Int. J. Control 35 (1982) 807–827. | Zbl | DOI
[10] , Multi-objective seaport planning by MOORA decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. 206 (2013) 39–58. | Zbl | DOI
[11] , Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society, A Revolution in Economic Thinking By Multi-Objective Optimization. In: Vol. 342 of Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers and Springer, Boston-Dordrecht-London (2004). | MR | Zbl
[12] and , Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica 25 (2014) 1–20. | DOI
[13] , and , Multiple criteria hierarchy process with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Omega 41 (2013) 820–846. | DOI
[14] and , Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2000). | Zbl | MR
[15] and , Application of AHP/EVAMIX method for decision making in the industrial environment. Am. J. Oper. Res. 3 (2013) 542.
[16] , , Criteria in AHP: a systematic review of literature. Proc. Comput. Sci. 55 (2015) 1123–1132. | DOI
[17] and , The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55 (2017) 6653–6675. | DOI
[18] and , Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139 (2002) 317–326. | Zbl | DOI
[19] , and , ELECTRE methods. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York, NY (2005) 133–153. | Zbl
[20] , , and , An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20 (2013) 61–85. | DOI
[21] and , ELECTRE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 (2016) 1–29. | MR | DOI
[22] and , The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 33 (1987) 1383–1403. | MR | DOI
[23] , and , The regime method: a new multicriteria technique. Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: Vol. 209 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1983) 146–155. | DOI
[24] , and , A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20 (1993) 889–899. | Zbl | DOI
[25] , , and , Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Eng. App. Artif. Intell. 34 (2014) 168–177. | DOI
[26] , , , , and , Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28 (2015) 516–571. | DOI
[27] and , The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Struct. Multi. Optim. 41 (2010) 853–862. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[28] , A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage. 6 (2006) 65–78. | DOI
[29] and , A note on the information content of a consistent pairwise comparison judgment matrix of an AHP decision maker. Theory Decis. 34 (1993) 99–108. | Zbl | DOI
[30] and , Health-safety and environmental risk assessment of refineries using of multi criteria decision making method. Apcbee Proc. 3 (2012) 235–238. | DOI
[31] , Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15 (1977) 234–281. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[32] , The Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill (1980). | MR | Zbl
[33] , Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1 (2008) 83–98. | Zbl
[34] , Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996).
[35] , and , Optimized AHP to overcome limits in weight calculation: a building performance application. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2017) 04017101. | DOI
[36] , and , User reporting-based semeiotic assessment of existing building stock at the regional scale. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (2018) 04018079. | DOI
[37] , , and , A new index to evaluate exposure and potential damage to RC building structures in coastal areas. Eng. Fail. Anal. 100 (2019) 439–455. | DOI
[38] , and , An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 45 (2007) 801–813. | Zbl | DOI
[39] and , Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2011). | MR | Zbl | DOI
[40] and , An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10 (2013) 56–66. | MR
[41] , On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 173 (2006) 985–991. | MR | Zbl
[42] , , , and , Localized weighted sum method for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22 (2016) 3–18. | DOI
[43] , Modeling decision processes of a green supply chain with regulation on energy saving level. Comput. Oper. Res. 54 (2015) 266–273. | MR | DOI
Cité par Sources :
