no. 3
An integrated, multi-criteria approach based on environmental, economic, social, and competency criteria for supplier selection
RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 3, pp. 1487-1500

Supplier selection (SS), which is a critical stage of supply chain management (SCM), is no longer evaluated solely from the perspective of traditional criteria, due to increasing environmental problems and ethical concerns. In this study, a multidimensional approach including environmental, economic, social, and competency concepts was proposed to evaluate SS, and an integrated approach based on Best Worst Method (BWM) and fuzzy TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of Interactive and Multi-criteria Decision Making) techniques was developed. In the developed approach, BWM was used to first obtain the importance level of the criteria and then to rank the suppliers with fuzzy TODIM. The proposed approach was tested on an automotive company in Turkey. The outcomes of the analysis revealed that the most important main criteria for SS are economic (0.377) and environmental criteria (0.290). In addition, the sub-criteria with the highest criteria weight were listed as product cost (0.120), on-time delivery (0.112), quality control (0.094), logistics costs (0.069), management commitment (0.054), and flexibility (0.054). The results of this study offer theoretical and practical outputs to companies that want to improve their SS process, selection of suppliers, and contributions of the researchers working on the topic.

Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2021041
Classification : 65C20, 90C05
Keywords: Supply Chain Management, supplier selection, Best Worst Method, fuzzy TODIM method, Multi-Criteria Decision Making 
@article{RO_2021__55_3_1487_0,
     author = {Baki, Rahmi},
     title = {An integrated, multi-criteria approach based on environmental, economic, social, and competency criteria for supplier selection},
     journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
     pages = {1487--1500},
     year = {2021},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {55},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2021041},
     mrnumber = {4269475},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021041/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baki, Rahmi
TI  - An integrated, multi-criteria approach based on environmental, economic, social, and competency criteria for supplier selection
JO  - RAIRO. Operations Research
PY  - 2021
SP  - 1487
EP  - 1500
VL  - 55
IS  - 3
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021041/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2021041
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2021__55_3_1487_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Baki, Rahmi
%T An integrated, multi-criteria approach based on environmental, economic, social, and competency criteria for supplier selection
%J RAIRO. Operations Research
%D 2021
%P 1487-1500
%V 55
%N 3
%I EDP-Sciences
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2021041/
%R 10.1051/ro/2021041
%G en
%F RO_2021__55_3_1487_0
Baki, Rahmi. An integrated, multi-criteria approach based on environmental, economic, social, and competency criteria for supplier selection. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021) no. 3, pp. 1487-1500. doi: 10.1051/ro/2021041

[1] A. T. Almeida, Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method. Comput. Oper. Res. 34 (2007) 3569–3574. | Zbl | DOI

[2] N. Banaeian, H. Mobli, B. Fahimnia, I. E. Nielsen and M. Omid, Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Comput. Oper. Res. 89 (2018) 337–347. | MR | DOI

[3] Q. Cao, J. Wu and C. Liang, An intuitionsitic fuzzy judgement matrix and TOPSIS integrated multi-criteria decision making method for green supplier selection. J. Intel. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (2015) 117–126. | MR | DOI

[4] Y. S. Chen and C. H. Chang, The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. J. Bus. Ethics 116 (2013) 107–119. | DOI

[5] H. M. W. Chen, S. Y. Chou, Q. D. Luu and T. H. K. Yu, A fuzzy MCDM approach for green supplier selection from the economic and environmental aspects. Math. Prob. Eng. 2016 (2016).

[6] I. Dalić, Ž. Stević, C. Karamasa and A. Puška, A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: green supplier selection. Decis. Making: App. Manage. Eng. 3 (2020) 126–145.

[7] F. Ecer, Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer. Oper. Res. (2020) 1–35.

[8] B. Fahimnia, J. Sarkis, A. Choudhary and A. Eshragh, Tactical supply chain planning under a carbon tax policy scheme: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 206–215. | DOI

[9] Z. P. Fan, X. Zhang, F. D. Chen and Y. Liu, Extended TODIM method for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 42 (2013) 40–48. | DOI

[10] M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, M. Amiri and A. Esmaeili, Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. J. Cleaner Prod. 137 (2016) 213–229. | DOI

[11] L. F. A. M. Gomes and L. A. D. Rangel, An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 193 (2009) 204–211. | Zbl | DOI

[12] K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi and A. Jafarian, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 47 (2013) 345–354. | DOI

[13] P. Guarnieri and F. Trojan, Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: a study in the textile industry. Res. Conserv. Recycling 141 (2019) 347–361. | DOI

[14] Z. Guo, H. Liu, D. Zhang and J. Yang, Green supplier evaluation and selection in apparel manufacturing using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability 9 (2017) 650. | DOI

[15] H. Gupta and M. K. Barua, Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J. Cleaner Prod. 152 (2017) 242–258. | DOI

[16] S. Gupta, U. Soni and G. Kumar, Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: a case study in automotive industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 136 (2019) 663–680. | DOI

[17] O. Gurel, A. Z. Acar, I. Onden and I. Gumus, Determinants of the green supplier selection. Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 181 (2015) 131–139. | DOI

[18] S. Hendiani, A. Mahmoudi and H. Liao, A multi-stage multi-criteria hierarchical decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 94 (2020) 106456. | DOI

[19] J. Huang, Z. S. Li and H. C. Liu, New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (2017) 302–309. | DOI

[20] M. O. M. Javad, M. Darvishi and A. O. M. Javad, Green supplier selection for the steel industry using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study of Khouzestan Steel Company. Sustainable Futures 2 (2020) 100012. | DOI

[21] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263–292. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[22] D. Kannan, A. B. L. S. Jabbour and C. J. C. Jabbour, Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (2014) 432–447. | MR | Zbl | DOI

[23] R. Kumari and A. R. Mishra, Multi-criteria COPRAS method based on parametric measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets: application of green supplier selection. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 44 (2020) 1645–1662. | DOI

[24] H. C. Liu, M. Y. Quan, Z. Li and Z. L. Wang, A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Inf. Sci. 486 (2019) 254–270. | DOI

[25] A. R. Mishra, P. Rani, K. R. Pardasani and A. Mardani, A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures. J. Cleaner Prod. 238 (2019) 1–16. | DOI

[26] J. Qin, X. Liu and W. Pedrycz, An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 258 (2017) 626–638. | MR | DOI

[27] J. Rezaei, Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53 (2015) 49–57. | DOI

[28] J. Rezaei, T. Nispeling, J. Sarkis and L. Tavasszy, A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J. Cleaner Prod. 135 (2016) 577–588. | DOI

[29] R. Rostamzadeh, K. Govindan, A. Esmaeili and M. Sabaghi, Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecol. Indicators 49 (2015) 188–203. | DOI

[30] K. Shaw, R. Shankar, S. S. Yadav and L. S. Thakur, Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst. App. 39 (2012) 8182–8192. | DOI

[31] L. Shen, L. Olfat, K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi and A. Diabat, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Res. Conserv. Recycling 74 (2013) 170–179. | DOI

[32] H. L. Wei, J. J. Liou, H. S. Wang and Y. S. Tsai, An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J. Cleaner Prod. 190 (2018) 339–352. | DOI

[33] S. H. Zolfani, F. Ecer, D. Pamučar and S. Raslanas, Neighbourhood selection for a newcomer via a novel BWM-based revised MAIRCA integrated model: a case from the Coquimbo-La Serena conurbation. Chile. Int. J. Strategic Property Manage. 24 (2020) 102–118. | DOI

Cité par Sources :