This paper builds the multi-period optimization models that incorporate put option contract and two supply chain structures to determine the production decision for a supplier and the ordering decision for a manufacturer in a two-stage supply chain. This paper applies the method of dynamic programming to derive the structures of optimal policies and provides an approximate algorithm to evaluate the myopic policies. This paper also conducts numerical examples to illustrate the impacts of put option contract, supply chain structure and demand risk on the members’ decisions and total profits as well as the channel’s total profit. The results indicate that put option contract can motivate to increase the channel’s service level and reduce the manufacturer’s inventory risk under two supply chain structures, when compared to the case without put option contract. In the manufacturer-led structure, the channel always benefits from put option contract, the supplier benefits from put option contract with a high option price and a low exercise price, while the manufacturer benefits from put option contract with a low option price and a high exercise price. In the supplier-led structure, the channel and the manufacturer always benefit from put option contract, while the supplier benefits from put option contract with a high option price and a low exercise price. With put option contract, the supplier is more profitable in the manufacturer-led structure than in the supplier-led structure, while the manufacturer and the channel are more profitable in the supplier-led structure than in the manufacturer-led structure. Without and with put option contract, the optimal total profits of two members and the channel will first decrease and then increase in the demand risk. Finally, this paper identifies the explicit conditions under which the multi-period supply chain can be coordinated via put option contract under two supply chain structures. With a coordinating contract, the supplier and the manufacturer are better off compared to the case without put option contract.
Accepté le :
Première publication :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1051/ro/2020071
Keywords: Multi-period supply chain, supply chain coordination, Put option contract, supply chain structure
@article{RO_2021__55_S1_S1969_0,
author = {Wan, Nana and Fan, Jianchang},
title = {Impacts of put option contract and supply chain structure in a multi-period supply chain with uncertain demand},
journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
pages = {S1969--S1996},
year = {2021},
publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
volume = {55},
doi = {10.1051/ro/2020071},
mrnumber = {4223177},
zbl = {1469.90047},
language = {en},
url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020071/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Wan, Nana AU - Fan, Jianchang TI - Impacts of put option contract and supply chain structure in a multi-period supply chain with uncertain demand JO - RAIRO. Operations Research PY - 2021 SP - S1969 EP - S1996 VL - 55 PB - EDP-Sciences UR - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020071/ DO - 10.1051/ro/2020071 LA - en ID - RO_2021__55_S1_S1969_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Wan, Nana %A Fan, Jianchang %T Impacts of put option contract and supply chain structure in a multi-period supply chain with uncertain demand %J RAIRO. Operations Research %D 2021 %P S1969-S1996 %V 55 %I EDP-Sciences %U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020071/ %R 10.1051/ro/2020071 %G en %F RO_2021__55_S1_S1969_0
Wan, Nana; Fan, Jianchang. Impacts of put option contract and supply chain structure in a multi-period supply chain with uncertain demand. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021), pp. S1969-S1996. doi: 10.1051/ro/2020071
[1] , and , A revenue-sharing option contract toward coordination of supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 178 (2016) 42–56. | DOI
[2] , and , Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019) 1772–1796. | DOI
[3] , and , Optimal policies for inventory systems with concave ordering costs. Nav. Res. Logist. 65 (2018) 291–302. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[4] and , A mathematical model on eco-friendly manufacturing system under probabilistic demand. RAIRO:OR 53 (2019) 1899–1913. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI
[5] and , Value of a put option to the risk-averse newsvendor. IIE Trans. 39 (2007) 481–500. | DOI
[6] , and , Power structure and profitability in assembly supply chains. Prod. Oper. Manage. 23 (2014) 1599–1616. | DOI
[7] and , Optimal control policies for a periodic review inventory system with emergency orders. Nav. Res. Logist. 45 (1998) 187–204. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[8] , An option mechanism to coordinate a dyadic supply chain bilaterally in a multi-period setting. Omega 88 (2019) 196–209. | DOI
[9] and , Structure of optimal policies to periodic-review inventory models with convex costs and backorders for all values of discount factors. Ann. Oper. Res. (2017). DOI: . | DOI | MR | Zbl
[10] and , Optimal production policy for a closed-loop hybrid system with uncertain demand and return under supply disruption. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016) 2015–2028. | DOI
[11] , and , Competitive pricing and ordering decisions in a multiple-channel supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 54 (2014) 156–165. | DOI
[12] , and , A relief supplies purchasing model based on a put option contract. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127 (2019) 253–262. | DOI
[13] , and , Joint pricing and inventory problem with price dependent stochastic demand and price discounts. Comput. Ind. Eng. 114 (2017) 45–53. | DOI
[14] , and , On a multi-period supply chain system with supplementary order opportunity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 209 (2011) 273–284. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[15] and , Inventory control with a fixed cost and a piecewise linear convex cost. Prod. Oper. Manage. 23 (2014) 1966–1984. | DOI
[16] , and , Joint inventory and pricing coordination with incomplete demand information. Prod. Oper. Manage. 25 (2016) 701–718. | DOI
[17] , Exploring Omni-channel supply chain under price and delivery time sensitive stochastic demand. Supply Chain Forum: Int. J. 18 (2017) 218–230. | DOI
[18] and , Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272 (2019) 147–161. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[19] and , Using social work donation as a tool of corporate social responsibility in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon emissions tax and demand uncertainty. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2019). DOI: | DOI
[20] , Price sensitive demand with random sales price – a newsboy problem. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 43 (2012) 491–498. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[21] , and , Impacts of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Prod. Oper. Manage. 22 (2013) 1232–1249. | DOI
[22] , and , Multi-period optimization with loss-averse customer behavior: joint pricing and inventory decisions with stochastic demand. Expert Syst. App. 72 (2017) 421–429. | DOI
[23] and , The role of put option contracts in supply chain management under inflation. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 26 (2019) 1451–1474. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[24] and , Joint order and pricing decisions for fresh produce with put option contracts. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 69 (2018) 474–484. | DOI
[25] and , Pricing policies for dual-channel supply chain with green investment and sales effort under uncertain demand. Math. Comput. Simul. 171 (2020) 79–93. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[26] , and , Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239 (2014) 130–145. | MR | Zbl | DOI
[27] , and , Optimal inventory and hedging decisions with CVaR consideration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162 (2015) 70–82. | DOI
[28] , and , Push, pull, and supply chain risk-averse attitude. Prod. Oper. Manage. 27 (2018) 1534–1552. | DOI
[29] , and , Coordinated pricing and inventory control problems with capacity constraints and fixed ordering cost. Nav. Res. Logist. 59 (2012) 376–383. | MR | Zbl | DOI
Cité par Sources :
