Leagile supply chain network design through a dynamic two-phase optimization in view of order penetration point
RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021), pp. S1369-S1394

In the contemporary world, combining the concept of agile and lean manufacturing (LM) is one of the most strategic and appealing concerns in the industrial environments. In this paper, a new Leagile structure is proposed for a supply chain. This research covers long term and mid-term horizon by designing a supply chain network up to the order penetration point (OPP) and final assembly and sale planning respectively. The problem is programmed in two phases. First, a bi-objective optimization is developed to minimize the total cost related with LM. In the second phase, the total cost and the customer service level (CSL) are considered as the agile manufacturing (AM) architecture. In the proposed model, a utility function is applied to set balance between the price and customer satisfaction. In addition, a robust credibility-based fuzzy programming (RCFP) is developed to handle uncertainty of the first phase. The proposed model and the solution method are implemented for a real industrial case study to show the applicability and usefulness of this study. According to the results, improving the customer service level can enhance the total cost of the second phase meaning that customer responsiveness price is too high for the proposed system.

DOI : 10.1051/ro/2020041
Classification : 90B06
Keywords: Leagile manufacturing, supply chain network design, order penetration point, robust optimization, credibility measure
@article{RO_2021__55_S1_S1369_0,
     author = {Rabbani, Masoud and Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, Soroush and Manavizadeh, Neda},
     title = {Leagile supply chain network design through a dynamic two-phase optimization in view of order penetration point},
     journal = {RAIRO. Operations Research},
     pages = {S1369--S1394},
     year = {2021},
     publisher = {EDP-Sciences},
     volume = {55},
     doi = {10.1051/ro/2020041},
     mrnumber = {4223127},
     zbl = {1469.90043},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020041/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rabbani, Masoud
AU  - Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, Soroush
AU  - Manavizadeh, Neda
TI  - Leagile supply chain network design through a dynamic two-phase optimization in view of order penetration point
JO  - RAIRO. Operations Research
PY  - 2021
SP  - S1369
EP  - S1394
VL  - 55
PB  - EDP-Sciences
UR  - https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020041/
DO  - 10.1051/ro/2020041
LA  - en
ID  - RO_2021__55_S1_S1369_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Rabbani, Masoud
%A Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, Soroush
%A Manavizadeh, Neda
%T Leagile supply chain network design through a dynamic two-phase optimization in view of order penetration point
%J RAIRO. Operations Research
%D 2021
%P S1369-S1394
%V 55
%I EDP-Sciences
%U https://www.numdam.org/articles/10.1051/ro/2020041/
%R 10.1051/ro/2020041
%G en
%F RO_2021__55_S1_S1369_0
Rabbani, Masoud; Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, Soroush; Manavizadeh, Neda. Leagile supply chain network design through a dynamic two-phase optimization in view of order penetration point. RAIRO. Operations Research, Tome 55 (2021), pp. S1369-S1394. doi: 10.1051/ro/2020041

S. Aghamohammadi-Bosjin, M. Rabbani and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Agile two-stage lot-sizing and scheduling problem with reliability, customer satisfaction and behaviour under uncertainty: a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm. Eng. Optim. 52 (2020) 1–21. | MR | DOI

R. Babazadeh, J. Razmi and R. Ghodsi, Supply chain network design problem for a new market opportunity in an agile manufacturing system. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 8 (2012) 19–27. | DOI

B. Beemsterboer, M. Land and R. Teunter, Hybrid MTO-MTS production planning: an explorative study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248 (2016) 453–461. | DOI

B. Beemsterboer, M. Land and R. Teunter, Flexible lot sizing in hybrid make-to-order/make-to-stock production planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260 (2017) 1014–1023. | MR | DOI

A. Ben-Tal, L. El-Ghaoui and A. Nemirovski, Robust Optimization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009). | Zbl | MR | DOI

X. Brusset, Does supply chain visibility enhance agility? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171 (2016) 46–59. | DOI

H. Carvalho, S. Azevedo and V. Cruz-Machado, Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logist. Res. 4 (2012) 49–62. | DOI

F. Chan and A. Kumar, Performance optimization of a leagility inspired supply chain model: a CFGTSA algorithm based approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47 (2009) 777–799. | DOI

M. Ding, W. Ross and V. Rao, Price as an indicator of quality: implications for utility and demand functions. J. Retail. 86 (2010) 69–84. | DOI

M. El Mokadem, The classification of supplier selection criteria with respect to lean or agile manufacturing strategies. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 28 (2017) 232–249. | DOI

A. Faiza, Significance of lean, agile and leagile decoupling point in supply chain management. J. Econ. Behav. Stud. 3 (2011) 287–295. | DOI

B. Giri, C. Mondal and T. Maiti, Optimal product quality and pricing strategy for a two-period closed-loop supply chain with retailer variable markup. RAIRO: OR 53 (2019) 609–626. | MR | DOI

R. Gössinger and S. Kalkowski, Robust order promising with anticipated customer response. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 170 (2015) 529–542. | DOI

A. Hasani, S. Zegordi and E. Nikbakhsh, Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50 (2012) 4649–4669. | DOI

A. Haq and V. Boddu, Analysis of enablers for the implementation of leagile supply chain management using an integrated fuzzy QFD approach. J. Intell. Manuf. 28 (2017) 1–12. | DOI

S. Hum, M. Parlar and Y. Zhou, Measurement and optimization of responsiveness in supply chain networks with queueing structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264 (2018) 106–118. | MR | DOI

M. Inuiguchi and J. Ramı́K, Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 111 (2000) 3–28. | Zbl | MR | DOI

A. Jakubovskis, Flexible production resources and capacity utilization rates: a robust optimization perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 189 (2017) 77–85. | DOI

M. Khan, M. Hussain and L. Cárdenas-Barrón, Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55 (2017) 4816–4832. | DOI

H. Li and K. Womer, Optimizing the supply chain configuration for make-to-order manufacturing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 221 (2012) 118–128. | Zbl | MR | DOI

S. Liao, C. Hsieh and W. Ho, Multi-objective evolutionary approach for supply chain network design problem within online customer consideration. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 135–155. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI

M. Lim, H. Mak and Z. Shen, Agility and proximity considerations in supply chain design. Manage. Sci. 63 (2016) 1026–1041. | DOI

C. Lin and T. H. Wang, Build to order supply chain network design under supply and demand uncertainties. Trans. Res. B: Meth. 45 (2011) 1162–1176. | DOI

B. Liu and Y. Liu, Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10 (2002) 445–450. | DOI

Y. Liu, H. Dong, N. Lohse and S. Petrovic, A multi-objective genetic algorithm for nalyzingon of energy consumption and shop floor production performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 179 (2016) 259–272. | DOI

A. Lyons and A. Ma’Aram, An examination of multi-tier supply chain strategy alignment in the food industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014) 1911–1925. | DOI

M. Naim and J. Gosling, On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131 (2011) 342–354. | DOI

P. Nieuwenhuis and E. Katsifou, More sustainable automotive production through understanding decoupling points in leagile manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 95 (2015) 232–241. | DOI

F. Pan and R. Nagi, Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput. Oper. Res. 37 (2010) 668–683. | Zbl | DOI

D. Peidro, J. Mula, R. Poler and J.-L. Verdegay, Fuzzy optimization for supply chain planning under supply, demand and process uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 2640–2657. | Zbl | MR | DOI

M. Pishvaee, M. Rabbani and S. Torabi, A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 35 (2011) 637–649. | Zbl | MR | DOI

M. Pishvaee, J. Razmi and S. Torabi, Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: a new approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 206 (2012) 1–20. | Zbl | MR | DOI

S. Raj, S. Sundeer, Vinodh and G. Anand, A mathematical model to evaluate the role of agility enablers and criteria in a manufacturing environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 (2013) 5971–5981. | DOI

U. Sağlam and A. Banerjee, Integrated multiproduct batch production and truck shipment scheduling under different shipping policies. Omega 74 (2018) 70–81. | DOI

M. Seliaman, M. Khan and L. Cárdenas-Barrón, Algebraic modelling of a two level supply chain with defective items. RAIRO: OR 52 (2018) 415–427. | MR | Zbl | Numdam | DOI

A. Taleizadeh, S. Hadadpour, L. Cárdenas-Barrón, and A. Shaikh, Warranty and price optimization in a competitive duopoly supply chain with parallel importation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 185 (2017) 76–88. | DOI

S. Torabi and E. Hassini, An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159 (2008) 193–214. | Zbl | MR | DOI

S. Vinodh and S. Aravindraj, Evaluation of leagility in supply chains using fuzzy logic approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 (2013) 1186–1195. | DOI

B. Yan, J. Wu, L. Liu and Q. Chen, Inventory management models in cluster supply chains based on system dynamics. RAIRO: OR 51 (2017) 763–778. | MR | Numdam | DOI

A. Yimer and K. Demirli, A genetic approach to two-phase optimization of dynamic supply chain scheduling. Comput. Ind. Eng. 58 (2010) 411–422. | DOI

Y. Zhang, Y. Wang and L. Wu, Research on demand-driven leagile supply chain operation model: a simulation based on anylogic in system engineering. Syst. Eng. Proc. 3 (2012) 249–258. | DOI

Cité par Sources :