@article{JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0, author = {Kwan, Ernest and Friendly, Michael}, title = {Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures}, journal = {Journal de la Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique}, pages = {47--53}, publisher = {Soci\'et\'e fran\c{c}aise de statistique}, volume = {145}, number = {4}, year = {2004}, language = {en}, url = {http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0/} }
TY - JOUR AU - Kwan, Ernest AU - Friendly, Michael TI - Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures JO - Journal de la Société française de statistique PY - 2004 SP - 47 EP - 53 VL - 145 IS - 4 PB - Société française de statistique UR - http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0/ LA - en ID - JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Kwan, Ernest %A Friendly, Michael %T Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures %J Journal de la Société française de statistique %D 2004 %P 47-53 %V 145 %N 4 %I Société française de statistique %U http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0/ %G en %F JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0
Kwan, Ernest; Friendly, Michael. Discussion and comments : strong versus weak significance tests and the role of meta-analytic procedures. Journal de la Société française de statistique, Tome 145 (2004) no. 4, pp. 47-53. http://www.numdam.org/item/JSFS_2004__145_4_47_0/
The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
(1978).The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
(1993).The earth is round (p < 0.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
(1994).A primer on the understanding, use, and calculations of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educationai and Psychological Measurement, 61, 532-574. | MR
, & (2001).The modem hypothesis testing hybrid: R. A. Fisher's fading influence. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 145, 4, 5-26.
(2004).Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd. | JFM
(1925).The design of experiments. New York: Hafner. | JFM
(1935).Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
(1976).The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1993).Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
, & (1987).The statistics ritual in psychological research. Psychological Science, 5, 321, 325-328.
(1994).Interpreting and reporting results. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 125-149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. | MR
, & (2000).What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
, & (Eds.). (1997).Historical origins of statistical testing practices: The treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317-333.
(1993).A sensible formulation of the significance test. Psychological Methods, 5, 411-414.
, & (2000).The null hypothesis significance testing controversy and the teaching of introductory statistics. Submitted to Teaching of Psychology, under revision.
(2004).Theory-testing in psychology and physics: a methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103-115.
(1967).Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
(1978).Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and the two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 108-141.
(1990).The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393-425). Mahwah, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1997).An applied statistician's creed. Applied Statistics, 45, 401-410. | MR
(1996).Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 50, 241-301.
(2000).Narrow and shallow. American Psychologist, 55, 965-966.
(2000).The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38.
, & (1963).The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
(1960).Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
(1996).What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31, 24-31.
(2002).Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
, & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999).